Psychological distress and the increased risk of falling into poverty: a longitudinal study of Australian adults.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychological distress and the increased risk of falling into poverty: a longitudinal study of Australian adults.
Authors: Callander, Emily, Schofield, Deborah, Callander, Emily J (AUTHOR), Schofield, Deborah J (AUTHOR)
Source: Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology. Oct2015, Vol. 50 Issue 10, p1547-1556. 10p.
Subjects: Psychological distress, Downward mobility (Social sciences), Poverty, Longitudinal method, Australians, Poor people, Big data, Psychology, Risk assessment, Psychological stress
Geographic Terms: Australia
Abstract: Purpose: To identify whether psychological distress is associated with an increased risk of falling into poverty, giving a more complete picture of how psychological distress affects living standards.Methods: Longitudinal analysis of the nationally representative Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australian (HILDA) survey using Poisson regression models to estimate relative risk of falling into income poverty and multidimensional poverty between 2007 and 2012. The sample was limited to those who were not already in income poverty in 2007. Psychological distress was identified using the Kessler-10 (K10) scale.Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, having moderate psychological distress increased the risk of falling into income poverty by 1.62 (95% CI 1.31-2.01, p < 0.0001) and the risk of falling into multidimensional poverty by 1.85 (95% CI 1.37-2.48, p < 0.0001); having very high psychological distress increased the risk of falling into income poverty by 2.40 (95% CI 1.80-3.20, p < 0.0001) and the risk of falling into multidimensional poverty by 3.68 (95% CI 2.63-5.15, p < 0.0001), compared to those with low psychological distress. Those who did experience income poverty (RR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61, p = 0.0210) and those who experienced multidimensional poverty (RR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.32-2.17, p < 0.0001) had an increased risk of having their level of psychological distress increase further compared to those who did not experience poverty.Conclusion: To date, the increased risk of falling into poverty that is associated with elevated levels of psychological distress has been an overlooked burden of the condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:<bold>Purpose: </bold>To identify whether psychological distress is associated with an increased risk of falling into poverty, giving a more complete picture of how psychological distress affects living standards.<bold>Methods: </bold>Longitudinal analysis of the nationally representative Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australian (HILDA) survey using Poisson regression models to estimate relative risk of falling into income poverty and multidimensional poverty between 2007 and 2012. The sample was limited to those who were not already in income poverty in 2007. Psychological distress was identified using the Kessler-10 (K10) scale.<bold>Results: </bold>After adjusting for confounding factors, having moderate psychological distress increased the risk of falling into income poverty by 1.62 (95% CI 1.31-2.01, p < 0.0001) and the risk of falling into multidimensional poverty by 1.85 (95% CI 1.37-2.48, p < 0.0001); having very high psychological distress increased the risk of falling into income poverty by 2.40 (95% CI 1.80-3.20, p < 0.0001) and the risk of falling into multidimensional poverty by 3.68 (95% CI 2.63-5.15, p < 0.0001), compared to those with low psychological distress. Those who did experience income poverty (RR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61, p = 0.0210) and those who experienced multidimensional poverty (RR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.32-2.17, p < 0.0001) had an increased risk of having their level of psychological distress increase further compared to those who did not experience poverty.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>To date, the increased risk of falling into poverty that is associated with elevated levels of psychological distress has been an overlooked burden of the condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09337954
DOI:10.1007/s00127-015-1074-6