Evaluation of quality of life in a clinical trial with nonrandom dropout: the effect of epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Evaluation of quality of life in a clinical trial with nonrandom dropout: the effect of epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients.
Authors:	Fairclough, D.L., Gagnon, D.D., Zagari, M.J., Marschner, N., Dicato, M., Epoetin Alfa Study Group (CORPORATE AUTHOR)
Source:	Quality of Life Research. Dec2003, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p1013-1027. 15p.
Subjects:	Quality of life, Clinical trials, Placebos, Cancer treatment, Anemia, Drug therapy
Abstract:	Quality of life (QOL) endpoints from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of anemic cancer patients treated with nonplatinum-containing chemotherapy who received epoetin alfa or placebo were subjected to a sensitivity analysis. Three QOL instruments were used: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An), the Cancer Linear Analog Scale (CLAS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). The seven primary endpoints chosen a priori for analysis were: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Total, FACT-An fatigue subscale, CLAS energy, CLAS daily activities, CLAS overall QOL, and the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scales. Lower QOL scores were reported for patients who discontinued early, suggesting a nonrandom dropout process. Significant correlations (ranging from 0.37 to 0.77) between individual rates of change and the time to early termination of therapy or death supported this conclusion. Estimates of within-treatment-arm QOL change over time are more conservative with the missing not at random (MNAR) assumption as compared with the more optimistic estimates with the assumption that missing QOL data are missing at random (MAR). However, the between-treatment-arm comparisons were consistent across analyses, demonstrating statistically significant differences in favor of the epoetin alfa arm for four of the seven outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Description
Abstract:	Quality of life (QOL) endpoints from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of anemic cancer patients treated with nonplatinum-containing chemotherapy who received epoetin alfa or placebo were subjected to a sensitivity analysis. Three QOL instruments were used: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An), the Cancer Linear Analog Scale (CLAS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). The seven primary endpoints chosen a priori for analysis were: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Total, FACT-An fatigue subscale, CLAS energy, CLAS daily activities, CLAS overall QOL, and the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scales. Lower QOL scores were reported for patients who discontinued early, suggesting a nonrandom dropout process. Significant correlations (ranging from 0.37 to 0.77) between individual rates of change and the time to early termination of therapy or death supported this conclusion. Estimates of within-treatment-arm QOL change over time are more conservative with the missing not at random (MNAR) assumption as compared with the more optimistic estimates with the assumption that missing QOL data are missing at random (MAR). However, the between-treatment-arm comparisons were consistent across analyses, demonstrating statistically significant differences in favor of the epoetin alfa arm for four of the seven outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	09629343
DOI:	10.1023/A:1026116426494