Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Duloxetine in elderly major depression disorder: effectiveness and drug plasma level evaluation. |
| Authors: |
Rovera, Chiara, Mauri, Massimo Carlo, Bertin, Elena, Di Pace, Chiara, Paletta, Silvia, Reggiori, Alessandra, De Gaspari, Ilaria Francesca, Cattaneo, Dario, Mari, Daniela, Altamura, Alfredo Carlo |
| Source: |
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical & Experimental. Sep2016, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p349-355. 7p. |
| Subjects: |
Mental depression, Therapeutics, Duloxetine, Mental health of older people, Drug efficacy, Blood plasma |
| Abstract: |
Objective The aim of this open-label naturalistic study was to assess clinical outcomes and the predictive value of duloxetine plasma levels in major depressive disorder in the elderly. Methods This naturalistic, open-label design involved 35 outpatients aged between 65 and 87 years. Duloxetine plasma levels were collected in 24 patients after the first month. Patients were evaluated using 21-item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression, Hamilton Rating Scales for Anxiety, the Clinical Global Impression Severity, Mini Mental State Examination, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Barthel Index and Beck's Depression Inventory. Results Duloxetine plasma levels at T2 ranged from 4.9 to 201.9 ng/mL without a significant correlation between duloxetine dose and plasma levels. A significant improvement in mean 21-item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression total scores at T2,T3, T4, T9 and T12 and a progressive significantly decrease of the mean Hamilton Rating Scales for Anxiety scores from T3 to T12 were observed. Conclusions The levels of duloxetine in plasma do not correlate with a greater clinical improvement, indeed appear to adversely affect the improvement of the Beck Depression Inventory and Hamilton Rating Scales for Anxiety. This could be explained by an increase in side effects that may aggravate the discomfort felt by the patient. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical & Experimental is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
