Transitioning from DSM-IV to DSM-5: A systematic review of eating disorder prevalence assessment.
Saved in:
| Title: | Transitioning from DSM-IV to DSM-5: A systematic review of eating disorder prevalence assessment. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lindvall Dahlgren, Camilla, Wisting, Line |
| Source: | International Journal of Eating Disorders. Nov2016, Vol. 49 Issue 11, p975-997. 23p. 2 Diagrams, 8 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Eating disorders, MEDLINE, Classification of mental disorders, Online information services, Research funding, Systematic reviews, Sample size (Statistics), Disease incidence, Disease prevalence |
| Abstract (English): | ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on assessment of eating disorder prevalence during the DSM-IV era (1994-2015). Method A PubMed search was conducted targeting articles on prevalence, incidence and epidemiology of eating disorders. The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and was limited to DSM-IV based eating disorder diagnoses published between 1994 and 2015. Results A total of 74 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Results yielded evidence of over 40 different assessment instruments used to assess eating disorder prevalence, with the EAT-40 being the most commonly used screening instrument, and the SCID being the most frequently used interview. The vast majority of studies employed two-stage designs, closely followed by clinical interviews. Observations of higher prevalence rates were found in studies employing self-reports compared to two-stage designs and interviews. Discussion Eating disorder prevalence rates have varied significantly during the DSM-IV era, and are dependent on assessment methods used and samples investigated. Following the transition to the DSM-5, eating disorder prevalence will change, warranting novel approaches to assessment and treatment planning. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Resumen Objetivo El objetivo de este estudio fue hacer una revisión sistemática de la literatura en la evaluación de la prevalencia de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria durante la era del DSM-IV (1994-2015). Método Una búsqueda en PubMed fue realizada enfocada en artículos acerca de la prevalencia, incidencia y epidemiologia de los trastornos de la alimentación. La revisión fue realizada de acuerdo a las recomendaciones PRISMA y limitada a publicaciones con diagnósticos de trastornos de la conducta alimentaria basados en el DSM-IV y publicados entre 1994 y 2015. Resultados Un total de 74 estudios cumplieron con el criterio de inclusión y fueron incluidos en el estudio. Los resultados arrojaron evidencia de cerca de 40 diferentes instrumentos de evaluación utilizados para establecer la prevalencia de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria, siendo el EAT-40 el instrumento de tamizaje más comúnmente utilizado y siendo el SCID la entrevista más frecuentemente utilizada. La mayoría de los estudios utilizaron diseños en dos etapas, y con seguimiento cercano por entrevistas clínicas. Se encontró una tasa mayor de prevalencia en estudios con auto-reporte comparados con los estudios con diseño de dos etapas y entrevistas. Discusión La tasa de prevalencia de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria fue significativamente variada durante la era del DSM-IV y es dependiente de los métodos de evaluación utilizados y de la muestra investigada. Con la transición al DSM-5 la prevalencia de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria cambiará, garantizando así novedosos abordajes para la evaluación y planeación del tratamiento. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:975-997) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Eating Disorders is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on assessment of eating disorder prevalence during the DSM-IV era (1994-2015). Method A PubMed search was conducted targeting articles on prevalence, incidence and epidemiology of eating disorders. The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and was limited to DSM-IV based eating disorder diagnoses published between 1994 and 2015. Results A total of 74 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Results yielded evidence of over 40 different assessment instruments used to assess eating disorder prevalence, with the EAT-40 being the most commonly used screening instrument, and the SCID being the most frequently used interview. The vast majority of studies employed two-stage designs, closely followed by clinical interviews. Observations of higher prevalence rates were found in studies employing self-reports compared to two-stage designs and interviews. Discussion Eating disorder prevalence rates have varied significantly during the DSM-IV era, and are dependent on assessment methods used and samples investigated. Following the transition to the DSM-5, eating disorder prevalence will change, warranting novel approaches to assessment and treatment planning. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 02763478 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/eat.22596 |
