Selecting Suicide Ideation Assessment Instruments: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Selecting Suicide Ideation Assessment Instruments: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Authors: Erford, Bradley T., Jackson, Jessica, Bardhoshi, Gerta, Duncan, Kelly, Atalay, Zumra
Source: Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development. Jan-Mar2018, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p42-59. 18p.
Subjects: Medical screening, Meta-analysis, Health outcome assessment, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Suicidal ideation
Abstract: Psychometric meta-analyses and reviews were provided for four commonly used suicidal ideation instruments: the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation, the Suicide Ideation Questionnaire, the Suicide Probability Scale, and Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Practical and technical issues and best use recommendations for screening and outcome research are offered. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Psychometric meta-analyses and reviews were provided for four commonly used suicidal ideation instruments: the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation, the Suicide Ideation Questionnaire, the Suicide Probability Scale, and Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Practical and technical issues and best use recommendations for screening and outcome research are offered. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
ISSN:07481756
DOI:10.1080/07481756.2017.1358062