Further evaluation of contingencies on lying about homework completion.
Saved in:
| Title: | Further evaluation of contingencies on lying about homework completion. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Stocco, Corey S., Moline, Adam D., Bowar, Stephanie |
| Source: | Behavioral Interventions. Jul2021, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p620-634. 15p. 2 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Ethics, Academic achievement, Human services programs, Reward (Psychology), Descriptive statistics, Behavior modification, Deception, Praise |
| Abstract: | Lying during childhood can have a negative impact on the quality of relationships between caregivers and children. Although caregivers have identified lying as a major concern, few studies have evaluated the conditions under which lying about socially significant events is more or less probable. This study extended Sauter et al. (2020) in two ways. First, we assessed the extent to which modified baseline procedures reliably evoked lies about homework completion or academic dishonesty. Second, we evaluated the effects of an intervention package comprised of praise‐based components recommended by professionals and supported by previous research. When the praise‐based intervention was ineffective, we implemented a tangible intervention comprised of rules, and differential reinforcement. All participants lied about academic dishonesty under baseline conditions and continued to do so when researchers implemented the praise‐based intervention. In contrast, the tangible intervention increased honest reports for all participants and decreased academic dishonesty for two of three participants. These effects were replicated in probe sessions conducted by one participant's mother. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Behavioral Interventions is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Lying during childhood can have a negative impact on the quality of relationships between caregivers and children. Although caregivers have identified lying as a major concern, few studies have evaluated the conditions under which lying about socially significant events is more or less probable. This study extended Sauter et al. (2020) in two ways. First, we assessed the extent to which modified baseline procedures reliably evoked lies about homework completion or academic dishonesty. Second, we evaluated the effects of an intervention package comprised of praise‐based components recommended by professionals and supported by previous research. When the praise‐based intervention was ineffective, we implemented a tangible intervention comprised of rules, and differential reinforcement. All participants lied about academic dishonesty under baseline conditions and continued to do so when researchers implemented the praise‐based intervention. In contrast, the tangible intervention increased honest reports for all participants and decreased academic dishonesty for two of three participants. These effects were replicated in probe sessions conducted by one participant's mother. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10720847 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bin.1787 |
