Lived experiences of subjective binge eating: An inductive thematic analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Lived experiences of subjective binge eating: An inductive thematic analysis.
Authors: Brownstone, Lisa M., Mihas, Paul, M. Butler, Rachel, Maman, Suzanne, Peterson, Carol B., Bulik, Cynthia M., Bardone‐Cone, Anna M.
Source: International Journal of Eating Disorders. Dec2021, Vol. 54 Issue 12, p2192-2205. 14p. 7 Charts.
Subjects: Research methodology, Interviewing, Experience, Qualitative research, Bulimia, Descriptive statistics, Emotions, Thematic analysis
Abstract: Objective: Growing evidence suggests that subjective binge eating (SBE; loss of control eating involving subjectively, but not objectively, large quantities of food) is clinically concerning even though it is not currently considered a diagnostic criterion for eating disorders. However, the lived experience of SBEs has not been examined in a systematic, and data‐driven way. Method: The current study used a qualitative, inductive interview approach to further define SBEs as described by individuals who experience them. Participants (N = 14; 11 cisgender women, Mage = 35.29, 12 White/non‐Latinx) reported SBEs that occurred at least twice per week over the prior 3 months. We completed semi‐structured qualitative phone interviews with participants regarding their most recent SBE and objective binge‐eating episode (OBE) if applicable, as well as broader experiences and attitudes regarding non‐binge eating. Results: Inductive, reflexive, thematic coding yielded descriptive and interpretive codes regarding SBEs. Main themes regarding SBE experience included: (a) SBEs Occur Across Contexts and Food Types, (b) SBEs Are Contrasts to General Over‐Control, (c) SBEs Are Distress‐ and Disconnection‐Inducing, Not Relieving, (d) SBEs Are Responses to Hunger and Restriction, and (e) SBEs Can Be "Echoes" of OBEs. Discussion: The current study explored the lived experiences of those who report SBEs and provides an important foundation for hypothesis generation for future research on and clinical interventions for SBEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Eating Disorders is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Objective: Growing evidence suggests that subjective binge eating (SBE; loss of control eating involving subjectively, but not objectively, large quantities of food) is clinically concerning even though it is not currently considered a diagnostic criterion for eating disorders. However, the lived experience of SBEs has not been examined in a systematic, and data‐driven way. Method: The current study used a qualitative, inductive interview approach to further define SBEs as described by individuals who experience them. Participants (N = 14; 11 cisgender women, Mage = 35.29, 12 White/non‐Latinx) reported SBEs that occurred at least twice per week over the prior 3 months. We completed semi‐structured qualitative phone interviews with participants regarding their most recent SBE and objective binge‐eating episode (OBE) if applicable, as well as broader experiences and attitudes regarding non‐binge eating. Results: Inductive, reflexive, thematic coding yielded descriptive and interpretive codes regarding SBEs. Main themes regarding SBE experience included: (a) SBEs Occur Across Contexts and Food Types, (b) SBEs Are Contrasts to General Over‐Control, (c) SBEs Are Distress‐ and Disconnection‐Inducing, Not Relieving, (d) SBEs Are Responses to Hunger and Restriction, and (e) SBEs Can Be "Echoes" of OBEs. Discussion: The current study explored the lived experiences of those who report SBEs and provides an important foundation for hypothesis generation for future research on and clinical interventions for SBEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02763478
DOI:10.1002/eat.23636