Doctoral students' experiences of nondisclosure with their dissertation chair.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Doctoral students' experiences of nondisclosure with their dissertation chair.
Authors: Cook, Ryan M. (AUTHOR), Crabtree, Rachel (AUTHOR), Sackett, Corrine R. (AUTHOR), Baylin, Andrea (AUTHOR), Sharma, Jyotsana (AUTHOR)
Source: Counselor Education & Supervision. Mar2023, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p64-79. 16p.
Subjects: Doctoral students, Nondisclosure, Professional relationships, Academic dissertations, Phenomenology
Abstract: We examined doctoral students' experiences of nondisclosure with their dissertation chairs. Using a hermeneutic phenomenology design, we analyzed two individual interviews of 10 doctoral students. We identified the following three themes: (a) the professional dynamics in the relationship, (b) the interpersonal and cultural dynamics in the relationship, and (c) prioritization of completing the dissertation. Implications for doctoral students and dissertation chairs are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Counselor Education & Supervision is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:We examined doctoral students' experiences of nondisclosure with their dissertation chairs. Using a hermeneutic phenomenology design, we analyzed two individual interviews of 10 doctoral students. We identified the following three themes: (a) the professional dynamics in the relationship, (b) the interpersonal and cultural dynamics in the relationship, and (c) prioritization of completing the dissertation. Implications for doctoral students and dissertation chairs are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00110035
DOI:10.1002/ceas.12265