Exploring the psychometric properties of the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and Kidscreen10, self‐reported by adolescents with intellectual disability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring the psychometric properties of the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and Kidscreen10, self‐reported by adolescents with intellectual disability.
Authors: Davison, J., Maguire, S., McLaughlin, M., Simms, V., Bunting, B.
Source: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. May2023, Vol. 67 Issue 5, p415-426. 12p. 4 Charts.
Subjects: Well-being, Statistical reliability, Self-evaluation, Psychometrics, Special education schools, Cronbach's alpha, Quality of life, Factor analysis, Intraclass correlation, Research funding, Intellectual disabilities, Adolescence
Abstract: Background: There are no validated self‐report measures that can be used to assess health and wellbeing in adolescents with intellectual disability (ID). Method: The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of two newly adapted self‐report health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental wellbeing measures: the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (ID‐SWEMWBS) and Kidscreen10 (ID‐Kidscreen10). For this, we used data from a sample of 427 adolescents (aged 11–19) with ID recruited from special school settings. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to validate the factor structure of both measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and test–retest reliability was analysed using intra‐class correlation coefficients. The internal consistency measured using Cronbach's alpha was found to be in the range of 0.70–0.78, test–retest reliabilities were expressed using intra‐class correlation coefficients that were found to be high for both measures (ID‐SWEMWBS, 0.758; ID‐Kidscreen10, 0.723), and the CFA supported the unidimensional structure of both measures. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the ID‐SWEMWBS and ID‐Kidscreen10 have very good psychometric properties and can be used as self‐report measures to assess HRQoL and mental wellbeing in adolescents with ID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: There are no validated self‐report measures that can be used to assess health and wellbeing in adolescents with intellectual disability (ID). Method: The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of two newly adapted self‐report health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental wellbeing measures: the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (ID‐SWEMWBS) and Kidscreen10 (ID‐Kidscreen10). For this, we used data from a sample of 427 adolescents (aged 11–19) with ID recruited from special school settings. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to validate the factor structure of both measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and test–retest reliability was analysed using intra‐class correlation coefficients. The internal consistency measured using Cronbach's alpha was found to be in the range of 0.70–0.78, test–retest reliabilities were expressed using intra‐class correlation coefficients that were found to be high for both measures (ID‐SWEMWBS, 0.758; ID‐Kidscreen10, 0.723), and the CFA supported the unidimensional structure of both measures. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the ID‐SWEMWBS and ID‐Kidscreen10 have very good psychometric properties and can be used as self‐report measures to assess HRQoL and mental wellbeing in adolescents with ID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09642633
DOI:10.1111/jir.13016