Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).
Authors: Tabrizi, Fara F. (AUTHOR), Larsson, Andreas B. (AUTHOR), Grönvall, Hampus (AUTHOR), Söderstrand, Lux (AUTHOR), Hallén, Ellen (AUTHOR), Champoux-Larsson, Marie-France (AUTHOR), Lundgren, Tobias (AUTHOR), Sundström, Felicia (AUTHOR), Lavefjord, Amani (AUTHOR), Buhrman, Monica (AUTHOR), Sundin, Örjan (AUTHOR), McCracken, Lance (AUTHOR), Åhs, Fredrik (AUTHOR), Jansson, Billy (AUTHOR)
Source: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. Jul2023, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p295-316. 22p. 1 Diagram, 6 Charts.
Subjects: Adaptability (Personality), Psychometrics, Confirmatory factor analysis, Factor structure, Age groups
Abstract: Psychiatric disorders are common, and reliable measures are crucial for research and clinical practice. A cross-diagnostic construct that can be used to index treatment outcomes as well as prevalence of psychological ill health is psychological flexibility. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI has 12 subscales, six of which measure flexibility, and six that measure inflexibility. Using confirmatory factor analysis in a community sample of 670 participants, we found that a model with two higher order factors had satisfactory fit (CFI =.933) and a 12-factor model had the best fit to the data (CFI =.955). All 12 subscales showed adequate reliability (CRs =.803–.933) and the factor structure was similar across age groups and gender. Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MPFI is a reliable instrument that can be used to index psychological flexibility. Potential areas for improvement of the instrument are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Psychiatric disorders are common, and reliable measures are crucial for research and clinical practice. A cross-diagnostic construct that can be used to index treatment outcomes as well as prevalence of psychological ill health is psychological flexibility. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI has 12 subscales, six of which measure flexibility, and six that measure inflexibility. Using confirmatory factor analysis in a community sample of 670 participants, we found that a model with two higher order factors had satisfactory fit (CFI =.933) and a 12-factor model had the best fit to the data (CFI =.955). All 12 subscales showed adequate reliability (CRs =.803–.933) and the factor structure was similar across age groups and gender. Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MPFI is a reliable instrument that can be used to index psychological flexibility. Potential areas for improvement of the instrument are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:16506073
DOI:10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077