Peer-delivered services and peer support reaching people with schizophrenia: A scoping review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Peer-delivered services and peer support reaching people with schizophrenia: A scoping review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Evans, Megan, Barker, Hannah, Peddireddy, Snigdha, Zhang, Angela, Luu, Samantha, Qian, Yiqing, Tang, Patrick Y., Fisher, Edwin B. |
| Source: | International Journal of Mental Health. 2023, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p338-360. 23p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Diagnosis of schizophrenia, Affinity groups, Online information services, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, CINAHL database, Social support, Systematic reviews, Peer counseling, Medical care, Mental health, Social stigma, Experience, Social isolation, Research funding, MEDLINE, Literature |
| Abstract: | Peers with shared lived experience may help people with schizophrenia (PWS) recover in many ways, such as by assisting them to cope with debilitating symptoms, address practical challenges of living, combat stigma, and lessen social isolation. Despite their expansion in practice, peer-delivered services are not yet considered to be evidence-based practice for schizophrenia. This is due in part to the diversity of intervention components across programs, leading to uncertainty about just what these services entail. A focused examination of strategies and intended outcomes will facilitate more effective service design and delivery. To this end, this scoping review systematically examined the published literature describing peer-delivered services reaching PWS. The 22 studies reviewed described 20 unique interventions, representing significant diversity in formats and components, including those focused on psychological coping and practical skills, such as for independent living. Seven of nine studies measuring at least one key outcome (acute care utilization, patient functioning, positive or negative symptoms) found significant effects favoring peer-delivered intervention. Three of four studies measuring negative symptoms reported a reduction, notable considering these are often difficult to change. Results suggest areas for improvement, including a more thorough examination of program components and tailoring to the specific needs of PWS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Peers with shared lived experience may help people with schizophrenia (PWS) recover in many ways, such as by assisting them to cope with debilitating symptoms, address practical challenges of living, combat stigma, and lessen social isolation. Despite their expansion in practice, peer-delivered services are not yet considered to be evidence-based practice for schizophrenia. This is due in part to the diversity of intervention components across programs, leading to uncertainty about just what these services entail. A focused examination of strategies and intended outcomes will facilitate more effective service design and delivery. To this end, this scoping review systematically examined the published literature describing peer-delivered services reaching PWS. The 22 studies reviewed described 20 unique interventions, representing significant diversity in formats and components, including those focused on psychological coping and practical skills, such as for independent living. Seven of nine studies measuring at least one key outcome (acute care utilization, patient functioning, positive or negative symptoms) found significant effects favoring peer-delivered intervention. Three of four studies measuring negative symptoms reported a reduction, notable considering these are often difficult to change. Results suggest areas for improvement, including a more thorough examination of program components and tailoring to the specific needs of PWS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00207411 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00207411.2021.1975441 |
