Effects of exercise interventions on quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Effects of exercise interventions on quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Han, Bing (AUTHOR), Zhang, Peizhen (AUTHOR), Zhao, Haojie (AUTHOR), Zhang, Xiaojie (AUTHOR), Gao, Hongyue (AUTHOR), Dong, Jiating (AUTHOR), Zeng, Liqing (AUTHOR), Pi, Peng (AUTHOR), Pei, Jiayi (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psycho-Oncology. Jul2024, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p1-14. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Exercise physiology, Exercise therapy, Quality of life, Breast cancer, CINAHL database |
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare and rank the effectiveness of four primary categories of exercise modalities (aerobic, resistance, mind‐body, and combined exercise [CE]) in improving the Quality of life (QoL) of women with breast cancer in a network meta‐analysis (NMA). Methods: Articles published in English and indexed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases were identified from inception to 12 October 2023. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were assessed for risk of bias. A frequentist NMA was conducted to appraise the efficacy of different exercise types. Results: This study included 56 studies with 3904 participants. Aerobic, mind‐body, and combined exercises effectively improved QoL compared to controls. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that CE best improved patients' QoL (SUCRA = 96.7%). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggests that exercise reduced patients' depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.70 to −0.06, p < 0.001; I2 = 79%) and anxiety (SMD = −0.50, 95% CI = −0.69 to −0.31, p < 0.001; I2 = 27.4%) but did not affect self‐esteem. Conclusion: All exercise types but resistance were effective in improving the QoL of women with breast cancer, CE (the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise) had the highest likelihood of being optimal for improving QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare and rank the effectiveness of four primary categories of exercise modalities (aerobic, resistance, mind‐body, and combined exercise [CE]) in improving the Quality of life (QoL) of women with breast cancer in a network meta‐analysis (NMA). Methods: Articles published in English and indexed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases were identified from inception to 12 October 2023. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were assessed for risk of bias. A frequentist NMA was conducted to appraise the efficacy of different exercise types. Results: This study included 56 studies with 3904 participants. Aerobic, mind‐body, and combined exercises effectively improved QoL compared to controls. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that CE best improved patients' QoL (SUCRA = 96.7%). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggests that exercise reduced patients' depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.70 to −0.06, p < 0.001; I2 = 79%) and anxiety (SMD = −0.50, 95% CI = −0.69 to −0.31, p < 0.001; I2 = 27.4%) but did not affect self‐esteem. Conclusion: All exercise types but resistance were effective in improving the QoL of women with breast cancer, CE (the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise) had the highest likelihood of being optimal for improving QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10579249 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/pon.6370 |
