Scrolling and hyperlinks: The effects of two prevalent digital features on children's digital reading comprehension.
Saved in:
| Title: | Scrolling and hyperlinks: The effects of two prevalent digital features on children's digital reading comprehension. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Krenca, Klaudia, Taylor, Emily, Deacon, S. Hélène |
| Source: | Journal of Research in Reading. Aug2024, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p269-291. 23p. |
| Subjects: | Hyperlinks, Hypertext systems, Comprehension, Methodology, Discourse analysis |
| Abstract: | Background: This study examined how children's ability to understand what they read on screens is impacted by two specific digital features: hovering hyperlinks and scrolling. Methods: The participants were 75 English‐speaking children (M = 9.90 years, SD = 0.90 years) in Grades 3 to 5 who participated in an online research study. Using a within‐participants design, children read standardised passages from the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Tests (MacGinitie et al., 2000) and answered multiple‐choice comprehension questions. In one condition, passages were presented without digital features referred to as the clicking condition; in another, children had to scroll to navigate through the passages, in a third, there were hyperlinks that provided a word definition when a participant hovered their cursor over a blue and underlined word, and a final condition included both scrolling and hyperlinks. Results: As expected, there was a significant main effect of grade on children's ability to understand what they read, with better performance for children in Grade 5 than 3. Critically, there was a significant main effect of condition on children's performance on the reading comprehension questions, with higher scores for the condition with no digital features compared with the conditions with hovering hyperlinks and both scrolling and hovering hyperlinks. Performance was similar between the clicking and scrolling conditions. There was no significant interaction between grade and condition, showing consistency in effects across the upper elementary school years. Conclusions: These findings could inform the optimal design of digital texts by identifying digital features that do and do not interfere with reading comprehension, with hyperlinks providing word level information interfering and scrolling having no negative impacts. Highlights: What is already known about this topic Several meta‐analyses now show that reading comprehension on paper tends to be higher, particularly for informative texts, than when reading on a screen (e.g., Clinton, 2019; Delgado et al., 2018; Kong et al., 2018; Mangen et al., 2013; Singer & Alexander, 2017). What this paper adds We examine the effect of two specific features – scrolling and hovering hyperlinks providing definitions – on children's level of reading comprehension on screens.In a within‐participant experimental design using standardised measures, we find that hyperlinks providing word level information interfere with comprehension, with no negative impacts of scrolling. Implications for theory, policy or practice The results from this study offer new practical insights as to how digital features impact reading comprehension in a generation that is increasingly learning to read in a digital environment.On a methodological level, this study validates a simple way to modify standardised measures of reading comprehension to explore the impacts of digital features, an innovation readily adaptable to the exploration of many other digital features and age groups.On a theory level, these findings encourage the development of models of reading that consider features of digital texts along with the shallowing hypothesis, encouraging an integration of previously disparate theories of reading comprehension in order to fully understand children's reading of digital texts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Research in Reading is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: This study examined how children's ability to understand what they read on screens is impacted by two specific digital features: hovering hyperlinks and scrolling. Methods: The participants were 75 English‐speaking children (M = 9.90 years, SD = 0.90 years) in Grades 3 to 5 who participated in an online research study. Using a within‐participants design, children read standardised passages from the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Tests (MacGinitie et al., 2000) and answered multiple‐choice comprehension questions. In one condition, passages were presented without digital features referred to as the clicking condition; in another, children had to scroll to navigate through the passages, in a third, there were hyperlinks that provided a word definition when a participant hovered their cursor over a blue and underlined word, and a final condition included both scrolling and hyperlinks. Results: As expected, there was a significant main effect of grade on children's ability to understand what they read, with better performance for children in Grade 5 than 3. Critically, there was a significant main effect of condition on children's performance on the reading comprehension questions, with higher scores for the condition with no digital features compared with the conditions with hovering hyperlinks and both scrolling and hovering hyperlinks. Performance was similar between the clicking and scrolling conditions. There was no significant interaction between grade and condition, showing consistency in effects across the upper elementary school years. Conclusions: These findings could inform the optimal design of digital texts by identifying digital features that do and do not interfere with reading comprehension, with hyperlinks providing word level information interfering and scrolling having no negative impacts. Highlights: What is already known about this topic Several meta‐analyses now show that reading comprehension on paper tends to be higher, particularly for informative texts, than when reading on a screen (e.g., Clinton, 2019; Delgado et al., 2018; Kong et al., 2018; Mangen et al., 2013; Singer & Alexander, 2017). What this paper adds We examine the effect of two specific features – scrolling and hovering hyperlinks providing definitions – on children's level of reading comprehension on screens.In a within‐participant experimental design using standardised measures, we find that hyperlinks providing word level information interfere with comprehension, with no negative impacts of scrolling. Implications for theory, policy or practice The results from this study offer new practical insights as to how digital features impact reading comprehension in a generation that is increasingly learning to read in a digital environment.On a methodological level, this study validates a simple way to modify standardised measures of reading comprehension to explore the impacts of digital features, an innovation readily adaptable to the exploration of many other digital features and age groups.On a theory level, these findings encourage the development of models of reading that consider features of digital texts along with the shallowing hypothesis, encouraging an integration of previously disparate theories of reading comprehension in order to fully understand children's reading of digital texts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 01410423 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1467-9817.12468 |
