E Pluribus Unum? Why criteria should be multimethod and multirater.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: E Pluribus Unum? Why criteria should be multimethod and multirater.
Authors: Cucina, Jeffrey M., Hayes, Theodore L.
Source: Industrial & Organizational Psychology. Sep2024, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p314-318. 5p.
Subjects: Employee selection, Mixed methods research, Performance evaluation, Work sampling, Job performance
Abstract: The article focuses on the limitations of relying solely on supervisory ratings for personnel selection, advocating for a multimethod and multirater approach to enhance the validity of performance assessments. It emphasizes the importance of incorporating diverse criteria, such as training performance and work samples, to mitigate biases inherent in individual supervisory evaluations and ensure a more comprehensive understanding of employee capabilities.
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:The article focuses on the limitations of relying solely on supervisory ratings for personnel selection, advocating for a multimethod and multirater approach to enhance the validity of performance assessments. It emphasizes the importance of incorporating diverse criteria, such as training performance and work samples, to mitigate biases inherent in individual supervisory evaluations and ensure a more comprehensive understanding of employee capabilities.
ISSN:17549426
DOI:10.1017/iop.2024.14