The PERMA model of well‐being and student engagement amid Covid‐19: A two‐wave study among a sample of Filipino university students.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The PERMA model of well‐being and student engagement amid Covid‐19: A two‐wave study among a sample of Filipino university students.
Authors: Miranda, Jonee O. (AUTHOR), Tulabut, Olga Angelinetta P. (AUTHOR), De Ala, Cherry Lou (AUTHOR), Gonzales, Abigail (AUTHOR), M. Embalsado, Justin Vianey (AUTHOR), Estacio, Lee Vergel (AUTHOR), Mandap, Irish (AUTHOR), Medina, Aira Joy Keynn (AUTHOR), Montoya, Mary Anne Joseph (AUTHOR), Balilu, Beatriz (AUTHOR), Leon, June Rivera‐De (AUTHOR), Mangalus, Roger (AUTHOR), Pare, Ericka Lance (AUTHOR), Cruz, Reymond Neal C. (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychology in the Schools. Nov2024, Vol. 61 Issue 11, p4347-4360. 14p.
Subjects: Positive psychology, Education students, College students, Emotions, Academic achievement
Abstract: Previous research has underscored the negative effects on students of the abrupt shift to online delivery of education due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Positive education applies the principles of positive psychology to education, which highlights the importance of students' well‐being and fosters holistic development. This study investigated whether students' well‐being at the start of the semester can predict their academic engagement mid‐way through the semester. We collected data on students' well‐being and academic engagement in two waves; first, at the beginning of the semester (Time 1) and then 3 months in the semester (Time 2). We tested the students' general well‐being and the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment (PERMA) elements at Time 1 with their academic engagement in terms of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive facets at Time 2. Our results show that general well‐being at Time positively predicts their total academic engagement and all engagement facets. However, among the PERMA elements, the Meaning element is not correlated with students' engagement or any of its facets. We also tested whether there was a significant change in student well‐being and engagement from the start of the semester and midway through. We found that there is a significant small increase in well‐being and engagement. Our findings suggest the importance of well‐being as a potentially positive resource for students where students with better well‐being tend to be more academically engaged. Educational institutions may consider fostering student well‐being in their goals to improve the academic success of students. Practitioner points: Generally, students beginning the semester with better well‐being tend to have higher engagement in school midway through the semester.All PERMA model elements, except for meaning, are associated with student engagement semester.At the outset to midway through the semester, students had increased positive emotions, engagement, relationships, and accomplishment, and increases in behavioral and emotional engagement in school. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychology in the Schools is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Previous research has underscored the negative effects on students of the abrupt shift to online delivery of education due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Positive education applies the principles of positive psychology to education, which highlights the importance of students' well‐being and fosters holistic development. This study investigated whether students' well‐being at the start of the semester can predict their academic engagement mid‐way through the semester. We collected data on students' well‐being and academic engagement in two waves; first, at the beginning of the semester (Time 1) and then 3 months in the semester (Time 2). We tested the students' general well‐being and the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment (PERMA) elements at Time 1 with their academic engagement in terms of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive facets at Time 2. Our results show that general well‐being at Time positively predicts their total academic engagement and all engagement facets. However, among the PERMA elements, the Meaning element is not correlated with students' engagement or any of its facets. We also tested whether there was a significant change in student well‐being and engagement from the start of the semester and midway through. We found that there is a significant small increase in well‐being and engagement. Our findings suggest the importance of well‐being as a potentially positive resource for students where students with better well‐being tend to be more academically engaged. Educational institutions may consider fostering student well‐being in their goals to improve the academic success of students. Practitioner points: Generally, students beginning the semester with better well‐being tend to have higher engagement in school midway through the semester.All PERMA model elements, except for meaning, are associated with student engagement semester.At the outset to midway through the semester, students had increased positive emotions, engagement, relationships, and accomplishment, and increases in behavioral and emotional engagement in school. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00333085
DOI:10.1002/pits.23286