Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses Reveal no Gender Difference in Neonatal Social Perception.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses Reveal no Gender Difference in Neonatal Social Perception.
Authors: Karson, Lindsay (AUTHOR), Minhas, Hersimren (AUTHOR), Dhesi, Manraj (AUTHOR), Davies, Jeffrey (AUTHOR), Patel, Julie (AUTHOR), Eliot, Lise (AUTHOR)
Source: Social Development. Feb2025, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p1-18. 18p.
Subjects: Gender differences (Psychology), Gender differences (Sociology), Newborn infants, Behavioral assessment, Social perception, Empathy
Abstract: Women score higher than men on measures of social cognition such as empathy and reading non‐verbal cues. How early does this gender difference emerge? Systematic review and meta‐analyses were used to assess gender difference in social perception within 1 month of birth. A total of 31 studies (40 experiments) reported on gender effects in 1936 neonates (50% girls) between 1968 and 2021. No significant difference (Hedges' g = 0.076, p = 0.321) was found across 20 experiments measuring visual fixation on human faces. Nine experiments on neonatal imitative crying also revealed no gender difference (g = 0.157, p = 0.118). Seven studies using the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale found no gender difference in total orientation (g = 0.161, p = 0.154), but girls oriented more to both animate (g = 0.279, p = 0.011) and inanimate (g = 0.242, p = 0.003) stimuli in the studies that analyzed these separately. Existing evidence supports a possible maturational difference but not a specific social advantage for girls at birth. While more research and better reporting are needed, the present findings challenge the claim that girls are innately more socially perceptive than boys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Women score higher than men on measures of social cognition such as empathy and reading non‐verbal cues. How early does this gender difference emerge? Systematic review and meta‐analyses were used to assess gender difference in social perception within 1 month of birth. A total of 31 studies (40 experiments) reported on gender effects in 1936 neonates (50% girls) between 1968 and 2021. No significant difference (Hedges' g = 0.076, p = 0.321) was found across 20 experiments measuring visual fixation on human faces. Nine experiments on neonatal imitative crying also revealed no gender difference (g = 0.157, p = 0.118). Seven studies using the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale found no gender difference in total orientation (g = 0.161, p = 0.154), but girls oriented more to both animate (g = 0.279, p = 0.011) and inanimate (g = 0.242, p = 0.003) stimuli in the studies that analyzed these separately. Existing evidence supports a possible maturational difference but not a specific social advantage for girls at birth. While more research and better reporting are needed, the present findings challenge the claim that girls are innately more socially perceptive than boys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:0961205X
DOI:10.1111/sode.12790