Substance‐involved child‐to‐parent violence.
Saved in:
| Title: | Substance‐involved child‐to‐parent violence. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Harries, Travis (AUTHOR), Mayshak, Richelle (AUTHOR), Skvarc, David (AUTHOR), Eckhardt, Christopher (AUTHOR), Benstead, Michelle (AUTHOR), Miller, Peter (AUTHOR), Curtis, Ashlee (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Drug & Alcohol Review. Mar2025, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p820-828. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Substance abuse, Affect (Psychology), Abuse of parents, Control (Psychology), Family relations |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Child‐to‐parent violence (CPV) is associated with youth substance problems; however, CPV which is substance‐involved (SU‐CPV) is specifically excluded from the consensus definition of CPV and few studies have explored the familial context surrounding SU‐CPV. This study utilised the I3 model to explore associations between parental monitoring, parental intrusiveness, affective reactivity, concurrent reactive CPV and SU‐CPV in an Australian community sample of caregivers. Methods: A total of 119 caregivers experiencing abusive CPV (frequent and severe) completed an online survey reporting on incidence of CPV from 12 to 24‐year‐olds under their care, parenting behaviours, traits of the young person and their experience of SU‐CPV. Results: Poor parental monitoring was positively associated with SU‐CPV, and this relationship was stronger at higher levels of affective reactivity in the young person. There were no significant three‐way interactions. Discussion and Conclusions: SU‐CPV may be most likely to occur where opportunity for child substance use is high, and risk of escalation is also high. These findings should be used to inform current CPV intervention, which may otherwise neglect youth substance use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Introduction: Child‐to‐parent violence (CPV) is associated with youth substance problems; however, CPV which is substance‐involved (SU‐CPV) is specifically excluded from the consensus definition of CPV and few studies have explored the familial context surrounding SU‐CPV. This study utilised the I3 model to explore associations between parental monitoring, parental intrusiveness, affective reactivity, concurrent reactive CPV and SU‐CPV in an Australian community sample of caregivers. Methods: A total of 119 caregivers experiencing abusive CPV (frequent and severe) completed an online survey reporting on incidence of CPV from 12 to 24‐year‐olds under their care, parenting behaviours, traits of the young person and their experience of SU‐CPV. Results: Poor parental monitoring was positively associated with SU‐CPV, and this relationship was stronger at higher levels of affective reactivity in the young person. There were no significant three‐way interactions. Discussion and Conclusions: SU‐CPV may be most likely to occur where opportunity for child substance use is high, and risk of escalation is also high. These findings should be used to inform current CPV intervention, which may otherwise neglect youth substance use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09595236 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/dar.14011 |
