Beyond redemption: sad perpetrators and narratives of atrocity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Beyond redemption: sad perpetrators and narratives of atrocity.
Authors: Wagner, Kim A. (AUTHOR)
Source: Philosophical Psychology. Apr2025, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p1093-1098. 6p.
Subjects: Emotional experience, Twentieth century, Aversion, Atrocities, Redemption
Abstract: Commentary as part of the book symposium on Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic's, Perpetrator Disgust: The Moral Limits of Gut Feelings (2022): In Perpetrator Disgust, Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic provides a fascinating exploration of the emotional anguish experienced by perpetrators of atrocity during the 20th century. One of her most poignant insights is that physical discomfort rarely, if ever, compelled perpetrators to stop or reconsider the morality of their actions. Instead, it forced them to develop new strategies to avoid the emotional toll and to achieve their aims with greater efficiency. In this commentary, I discuss some of the aspects of Munch-Jurisic's argument, especially in regard to the definition of "perpetrator" as an analytical concept that might warrant further examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Commentary as part of the book symposium on Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic's, Perpetrator Disgust: The Moral Limits of Gut Feelings (2022): In Perpetrator Disgust, Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic provides a fascinating exploration of the emotional anguish experienced by perpetrators of atrocity during the 20th century. One of her most poignant insights is that physical discomfort rarely, if ever, compelled perpetrators to stop or reconsider the morality of their actions. Instead, it forced them to develop new strategies to avoid the emotional toll and to achieve their aims with greater efficiency. In this commentary, I discuss some of the aspects of Munch-Jurisic's argument, especially in regard to the definition of "perpetrator" as an analytical concept that might warrant further examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09515089
DOI:10.1080/09515089.2024.2397003