Retrospective Comparison of Patients Evaluated for Pediatric Autoimmune Encephalitis with Typical and Atypical Premorbid Neuropsychiatric Development.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Retrospective Comparison of Patients Evaluated for Pediatric Autoimmune Encephalitis with Typical and Atypical Premorbid Neuropsychiatric Development.
Authors: Panzer, Kira, Harmon, Alexis, Lerebours, Reginald, Sikich, Linmarie, Pullen, Samuel, Van Mater, Heather
Source: Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. Jun2025, Vol. 55 Issue 6, p2059-2066. 8p.
Subjects: Autoimmune encephalitis, Encephalitis diagnosis, Autoimmune disease diagnosis, Autoimmune thyroiditis, Child psychopathology, Research funding, Child psychiatry, Autoantibodies, Autism, Retrospective studies, Descriptive statistics, Neurological disorders, Encephalitis, Child development, Medical records, Acquisition of data, Epilepsy, Asperger's syndrome, Comparative studies, Immunity, Children
Abstract: Purpose: Patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) (i.e. autism, developmental delay, early-onset psychiatric or seizure disorders) increasingly seek evaluation of new or exacerbated symptoms concerning for autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Clinical AE evaluation can be challenging in NDD patients with symptom overlap between anti-neuronal autoimmunity and baseline atypical neurodevelopment. This study sought to explore differences in AE features by neurodevelopmental status. Methods: This retrospective chart review included 67 children with typical development (TD) or NDD evaluated for AE at the authors' institution. AE diagnosis included seronegative AE or seropositive AE with anti-NMDAR or anti-GAD antibodies. Reported AE clinical domains, symptom onset acuity, and treatment response were compared between three groups: (1) TD children with AE (TD-AE, N = 24); (2) NDD children with AE (NDD-AE, N = 21); and (3) NDD children with a non-AE diagnosis following appropriate workup (NDD-nonAE, N = 22). Results: Children with AE had a greater number of reported clinical domains than non-AE children with NDD (p < 0.0001) regardless of baseline developmental status. There were no observed differences in reported domains between TD-AE and NDD-AE groups. Onset acuity differed across the three groups (p = 0.04). No treatment response differences were observed between groups. Conclusion: NDD children with AE had a comparable number of reported clinical domains relative to TD children and a similar treatment response. NDD patients with AE had a greater number of reported clinical domains than their NDD peers without an AE diagnosis. These findings suggest that AE is a multi-domain process in both TD and NDD children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Purpose: Patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) (i.e. autism, developmental delay, early-onset psychiatric or seizure disorders) increasingly seek evaluation of new or exacerbated symptoms concerning for autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Clinical AE evaluation can be challenging in NDD patients with symptom overlap between anti-neuronal autoimmunity and baseline atypical neurodevelopment. This study sought to explore differences in AE features by neurodevelopmental status. Methods: This retrospective chart review included 67 children with typical development (TD) or NDD evaluated for AE at the authors' institution. AE diagnosis included seronegative AE or seropositive AE with anti-NMDAR or anti-GAD antibodies. Reported AE clinical domains, symptom onset acuity, and treatment response were compared between three groups: (1) TD children with AE (TD-AE, N = 24); (2) NDD children with AE (NDD-AE, N = 21); and (3) NDD children with a non-AE diagnosis following appropriate workup (NDD-nonAE, N = 22). Results: Children with AE had a greater number of reported clinical domains than non-AE children with NDD (p < 0.0001) regardless of baseline developmental status. There were no observed differences in reported domains between TD-AE and NDD-AE groups. Onset acuity differed across the three groups (p = 0.04). No treatment response differences were observed between groups. Conclusion: NDD children with AE had a comparable number of reported clinical domains relative to TD children and a similar treatment response. NDD patients with AE had a greater number of reported clinical domains than their NDD peers without an AE diagnosis. These findings suggest that AE is a multi-domain process in both TD and NDD children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01623257
DOI:10.1007/s10803-023-06065-9