What is the International Baccalaureate for? Exploring educational purpose through the Middle Years Programme's Personal Project.
Saved in:
| Title: | What is the International Baccalaureate for? Exploring educational purpose through the Middle Years Programme's Personal Project. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wright, Ewan (AUTHOR), Keung, Chrysa (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Educational Review. Jul2025, Vol. 77 Issue 5, p1672-1690. 19p. |
| Subjects: | International baccalaureate, Educational objectives, Academic qualifications, Counterculture, Educational quality |
| Abstract: | This article interrogates the purpose of the International Baccalaureate (IB), which is becoming an increasingly prominent feature of education systems worldwide. It specifically explores the enduring tensions between claims of a distinctively well-rounded education aimed at the whole person and the more instrumental function of enabling students to get ahead academically. Addressing "what the IB is for", the article employs Gert Biesta's writings on the need to reconnect with educational purpose across three domains: qualification, socialisation, and subjectification. To do so, it reports on a mixed-methods study of the Personal Project within the Middle Years Programme. First, quantitative data from over 40,000 students worldwide revealed that those with higher Personal Project scores also achieved higher scores in the Diploma Programme, indicating a synergy between the two in terms of qualification for high academic attainment. Second, qualitative data from 107 interviews conducted at schools in Hong Kong, Peru, Qatar, South Korea, the United States, and Zambia highlighted the Personal Project's potential to serve broader educational purposes, including socialisation and subjectification. However, these prospects may be overshadowed by schools prioritising high academic scores. The discussion reflects on the possibility of fulfilling multiple educational purposes, the threat of educational purpose being skewed towards qualification, and the worthwhile risk involved in pursuing more comprehensive objectives. The article concludes by calling for the IB to reaffirm its commitment to a well-rounded education that counters a measurement culture permeating schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Educational Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This article interrogates the purpose of the International Baccalaureate (IB), which is becoming an increasingly prominent feature of education systems worldwide. It specifically explores the enduring tensions between claims of a distinctively well-rounded education aimed at the whole person and the more instrumental function of enabling students to get ahead academically. Addressing "what the IB is for", the article employs Gert Biesta's writings on the need to reconnect with educational purpose across three domains: qualification, socialisation, and subjectification. To do so, it reports on a mixed-methods study of the Personal Project within the Middle Years Programme. First, quantitative data from over 40,000 students worldwide revealed that those with higher Personal Project scores also achieved higher scores in the Diploma Programme, indicating a synergy between the two in terms of qualification for high academic attainment. Second, qualitative data from 107 interviews conducted at schools in Hong Kong, Peru, Qatar, South Korea, the United States, and Zambia highlighted the Personal Project's potential to serve broader educational purposes, including socialisation and subjectification. However, these prospects may be overshadowed by schools prioritising high academic scores. The discussion reflects on the possibility of fulfilling multiple educational purposes, the threat of educational purpose being skewed towards qualification, and the worthwhile risk involved in pursuing more comprehensive objectives. The article concludes by calling for the IB to reaffirm its commitment to a well-rounded education that counters a measurement culture permeating schools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00131911 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00131911.2025.2502505 |
