Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
An International Validation of the Stigma Impact Scale With People With Dementia. |
| Authors: |
Bhatt, Jem, Evans‐Lacko, Sara, Scior, Katrina, Saunders, Rob |
| Source: |
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Jul2025, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p1-10. 10p. |
| Subjects: |
Statistical correlation, Goodness-of-fit tests, Research funding, Data analysis, Cronbach's alpha, Research methodology evaluation, Research evaluation, Descriptive statistics, Loneliness, Surveys, World health, Social integration, Psychometrics, Quality of life, Statistics, Research, Mathematical models, Dementia, Discrimination (Sociology), Factor analysis, Theory, Dementia patients, Social stigma, Social isolation |
| Abstract: |
Objective: A robust psychometric instrument is imperative to measure the devastating impact of self‐stigma in dementia to adequately inform policy and practice. Our objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Stigma Impact Scale in a global sample of people with dementia. Method: Data were analysed from the World Alzheimer Report including 710 participants in 42 countries who completed the SIS. Detailed psychometric analyses of the SIS included estimating reliability, convergent validity with the Warwick‐Edinburgh mental Well‐being Scale (WEMWBS) and the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL), the factor structure of the measure (through both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). Results: The SIS and its subscales had 'good' to 'excellent' internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.883–0.943). However, convergent validity correlations were not in the predicted direction; no significant correlations were noted between the SIS and the WEMWBS and DQoL. Factor analysis suggested marginal improvements in global fit indices for the observed model compared to the theoretical model, though none met the thresholds for acceptable fit. The final proposed model had three factors: rejection and secrecy, loneliness and belonging and perceived social isolation. Most SIS items were strongly endorsed by participants. Conclusion: The SIS is the most robustly tested instrument measuring self‐stigma in dementia. The SIS has good to excellent reliability and relevance to the target population, however future work is required to improve the factor structure of the scale. Further the results of the validity testing pose a number of theoretical and empirical questions for future research. Summary: Measuring self‐stigma in dementia with a robust, validated psychometric instrument would mean we could identify areas of concern for policy and practice.The Stigma Impact Scale (SIS), measuring self‐stigma in dementia, has been a valid and reliable measure in small samples but has never been subject to vigorous psychometric testingAll SIS items were endorsed by approximately 20% or more of people with dementia which suggests SIS items reflect relevant and identifiable constructs that resonate with the experience of dementiaResults of the current study confirm that SIS is a reliable measure in a global sample of people with dementia however validity and factor structure require further research efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
