Challenges and future directions in studying sequencing as a debiasing strategy in forensic psychological assessment: A commentary on Kukucka and Quigley‐McBride (2025).
Saved in:
| Title: | Challenges and future directions in studying sequencing as a debiasing strategy in forensic psychological assessment: A commentary on Kukucka and Quigley‐McBride (2025). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Oberlader, Verena (AUTHOR), Verschuere, Bruno (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Legal & Criminological Psychology. Sep2025, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p188-192. 5p. |
| Subjects: | Forensic psychology, Statistical bias, Research methodology, Criminal behavior, Validity of statistics |
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the persistence of bias in human information processing, particularly in forensic psychological assessments, and evaluates the effectiveness of the Linear Sequencing Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) approach as a debiasing strategy. A study involving 308 participants found that irrelevant case information biased criminal risk assessments, and presenting this information in a different sequence did not mitigate the bias. The authors address criticisms regarding their methodology and suggest future research directions to enhance the ecological validity of the LSU-E approach and explore its application in various forensic contexts. The findings underscore the need for ongoing efforts to improve objectivity and fairness in forensic psychological assessments. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Legal & Criminological Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the persistence of bias in human information processing, particularly in forensic psychological assessments, and evaluates the effectiveness of the Linear Sequencing Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) approach as a debiasing strategy. A study involving 308 participants found that irrelevant case information biased criminal risk assessments, and presenting this information in a different sequence did not mitigate the bias. The authors address criticisms regarding their methodology and suggest future research directions to enhance the ecological validity of the LSU-E approach and explore its application in various forensic contexts. The findings underscore the need for ongoing efforts to improve objectivity and fairness in forensic psychological assessments. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 13553259 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/lcrp.12314 |
