View in EDS

A suitable manner? Seven key elements of a dialogical approach to the Mental Health Act Assessment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A suitable manner? Seven key elements of a dialogical approach to the Mental Health Act Assessment.
Authors: Cant, Tom (AUTHOR), Manchester, Rob (AUTHOR)
Source: BJPsych Advances. Sep2025, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p290-298. 9p.
Subjects: Mental health services, ACT Assessment, Patient-professional relations, Mental health, Care of people
Abstract: SUMMARY: The Mental Health Act assessment or interview is a commonplace process in psychiatric services during which significant decisions are made about a person's care and liberty. Individuals have reported negative experiences of being subjected to these assessments, at times even influencing their ongoing relationship with healthcare and recovery. A 2018 independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) for England and Wales identified numerous areas for practice improvement, including the identification of epistemic injustice as part of current MHA processes. Nevertheless, the assessment process has received little attention on how it is conducted, with scant clinical guidance, training or research available on the subject. In this article the authors propose seven principles that assessors can incorporate into interviews to improve the way in which the MHA assessment is conducted. These principles have been drawn from a dialogical and relational approach to psychiatric care called Open Dialogue. A dialogical approach to MHA assessment could improve experiences of being assessed, information gathered, and, by preserving therapeutic relationships, give better longer-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BJPsych Advances is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:SUMMARY: The Mental Health Act assessment or interview is a commonplace process in psychiatric services during which significant decisions are made about a person's care and liberty. Individuals have reported negative experiences of being subjected to these assessments, at times even influencing their ongoing relationship with healthcare and recovery. A 2018 independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) for England and Wales identified numerous areas for practice improvement, including the identification of epistemic injustice as part of current MHA processes. Nevertheless, the assessment process has received little attention on how it is conducted, with scant clinical guidance, training or research available on the subject. In this article the authors propose seven principles that assessors can incorporate into interviews to improve the way in which the MHA assessment is conducted. These principles have been drawn from a dialogical and relational approach to psychiatric care called Open Dialogue. A dialogical approach to MHA assessment could improve experiences of being assessed, information gathered, and, by preserving therapeutic relationships, give better longer-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20564678
DOI:10.1192/bja.2025.14