The silent witness: The unseen gaps in eyewitness recognition of seizures.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The silent witness: The unseen gaps in eyewitness recognition of seizures.
Authors: Moraes, Johanna (AUTHOR), Cook, Mark (AUTHOR), Nurse, Ewan (AUTHOR)
Source: Epilepsia (Series 4). Aug2025, Vol. 66 Issue 8, pe169-e173. 5p.
Subjects: Seizures (Medicine), Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, Patient monitoring equipment, Electroencephalography, People with epilepsy, Witnesses
Abstract: This study evaluates eyewitness reliability in recognizing focal seizures, nonconvulsive generalized seizures, and psychogenic non‐epileptic seizure (PNES) using ambulatory electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring with home video. Analysis of 76 patients and 650 seizure events revealed that witnesses, often family or carers in proximity (witness in proximity [WIP]), did not appear to recognize over half of focal and generalized seizures (57.5% and 57.4%, respectively). PNES were more frequently recognized, and motor seizures were significantly more likely to be acknowledged (p = 0.0009). These findings highlight the limitations of eyewitness reports in seizure recognition and reinforce the necessity of objective monitoring tools in clinical epilepsy management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Epilepsia (Series 4) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:This study evaluates eyewitness reliability in recognizing focal seizures, nonconvulsive generalized seizures, and psychogenic non‐epileptic seizure (PNES) using ambulatory electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring with home video. Analysis of 76 patients and 650 seizure events revealed that witnesses, often family or carers in proximity (witness in proximity [WIP]), did not appear to recognize over half of focal and generalized seizures (57.5% and 57.4%, respectively). PNES were more frequently recognized, and motor seizures were significantly more likely to be acknowledged (p = 0.0009). These findings highlight the limitations of eyewitness reports in seizure recognition and reinforce the necessity of objective monitoring tools in clinical epilepsy management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00139580
DOI:10.1111/epi.18499