Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training on kinetic gait in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training on kinetic gait in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.
Authors: Yalfani, Ali (AUTHOR), Asgarpoor, Azadeh (AUTHOR)
Source: Disability & Rehabilitation. Aug2025, Vol. 47 Issue 17, p4443-4452. 10p.
Subjects: Chronic pain treatment, Phobias, Effect sizes (Statistics), Dynamics, Blind experiment, Visual analog scale, Statistical sampling, Two-way analysis of variance, Biofeedback training, Diagnosis, Gait in humans, Treatment effectiveness, Randomized controlled trials, Descriptive statistics, Pre-tests & post-tests, Pain management, Analysis of variance, Cognitive therapy, Body movement, Data analysis software, Ground reaction forces (Biomechanics), Lumbar pain, Evaluation
Abstract: Purpose of the article: Walking disorders are a significant issue for patients with low back pain. The aim of clinical trials is to compare the effects of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) and neurofeedback training (NFBT) on gait kinetics in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) patients. Materials and Methods: Sixty females with chronic non-specific low back pain were recruitment for clinical trials. They were randomly divided into experimental and one control groups (Each group 20 patients). The experimental group received the relevant interventions for eight weeks. The primary outcome was pain, kinesiophobia and disability. The secondary outcome was vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters. Two-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA statistical method was used for data analysis. Results: Within-group comparisons showed that neurofeedback training and cognitive functional therapy groups experienced significant improvement in pain intensity, disability and kinesiophobia after eight-week (p < 0.05). However, the cognitive functional therapy group improved the vertical ground reaction force parameters better than the neurofeedback training group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: cognitive functional therapy intervention had a greater effect on the vertical ground reaction force parameters. The reason for the greater effect of cognitive functional therapy intervention on vertical ground reaction force parameters can be partially explained due to the multimodal therapy used through cognitive exercises and motor control. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training was shown to reduce pain intensity, disability, and kinesiophobia, Consequently improving vertical ground reaction force parameters in patients with Chronic non-specific low back pain. Among the psychological interventions used, the cognitive functional therapy significantly showed more effectiveness in improving the vertical ground reaction force parameters of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Our research may inform clinical decision-making and guide the development of therapeutic interventions for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Purpose of the article: Walking disorders are a significant issue for patients with low back pain. The aim of clinical trials is to compare the effects of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) and neurofeedback training (NFBT) on gait kinetics in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) patients. Materials and Methods: Sixty females with chronic non-specific low back pain were recruitment for clinical trials. They were randomly divided into experimental and one control groups (Each group 20 patients). The experimental group received the relevant interventions for eight weeks. The primary outcome was pain, kinesiophobia and disability. The secondary outcome was vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters. Two-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA statistical method was used for data analysis. Results: Within-group comparisons showed that neurofeedback training and cognitive functional therapy groups experienced significant improvement in pain intensity, disability and kinesiophobia after eight-week (p < 0.05). However, the cognitive functional therapy group improved the vertical ground reaction force parameters better than the neurofeedback training group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: cognitive functional therapy intervention had a greater effect on the vertical ground reaction force parameters. The reason for the greater effect of cognitive functional therapy intervention on vertical ground reaction force parameters can be partially explained due to the multimodal therapy used through cognitive exercises and motor control. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training was shown to reduce pain intensity, disability, and kinesiophobia, Consequently improving vertical ground reaction force parameters in patients with Chronic non-specific low back pain. Among the psychological interventions used, the cognitive functional therapy significantly showed more effectiveness in improving the vertical ground reaction force parameters of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Our research may inform clinical decision-making and guide the development of therapeutic interventions for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09638288
DOI:10.1080/09638288.2025.2451219