"Are You on the Phone Track, Are You on the Video Track, Are You on the In-Person Track?": Outpatient Healthcare Social Workers' Experiences with Telehealth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: "Are You on the Phone Track, Are You on the Video Track, Are You on the In-Person Track?": Outpatient Healthcare Social Workers' Experiences with Telehealth.
Authors: Cristofalo, Margaret A (AUTHOR)
Source: Health & Social Work. Nov2025, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p297-306. 10p.
Subjects: Job involvement, Health services accessibility, Social workers, Professional practice, Outpatient services in hospitals, Prompts (Psychology), Interviewing, Social services, Travel, Caring, Social worker attitudes, Patient care, Judgment sampling, Continuum of care, Home environment, Information technology, Telemedicine, Thematic analysis, Job satisfaction, Working hours, Research methodology, Telephones, Medical appointments, Professional employee training, Clinical competence, Data analysis software, Clinics, Human comfort, Telecommuting, Literacy, Video recording, Patient participation
Abstract: Since its rapid scale-up at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become an established and pervasive modality of engagement in outpatient healthcare. There is minimal literature on its use by healthcare social workers, who expand across myriad roles and types of practice. The purpose of this article is to explore outpatient healthcare social workers' experiences with telehealth and their perceptions about its effect on their patients, particularly safety net populations. Semistructured interviews addressing effects of telehealth utilization on social workers, their practice, and their patients were completed with outpatient healthcare social workers (N = 21) from two urban medical centers. Three overarching themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) telehealth facilitators and challenges to access; (2) telehealth's positive and negative effects on engagement, assessment, and intervention; and (3) telehealth work satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Results illustrate the need for increasing discernment for the benefit of patients to delineate paths of engagement through video, phone, hybrid, or in-person modalities by assessing the types of contextual factors identified by study participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Health & Social Work is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Since its rapid scale-up at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become an established and pervasive modality of engagement in outpatient healthcare. There is minimal literature on its use by healthcare social workers, who expand across myriad roles and types of practice. The purpose of this article is to explore outpatient healthcare social workers' experiences with telehealth and their perceptions about its effect on their patients, particularly safety net populations. Semistructured interviews addressing effects of telehealth utilization on social workers, their practice, and their patients were completed with outpatient healthcare social workers (N = 21) from two urban medical centers. Three overarching themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) telehealth facilitators and challenges to access; (2) telehealth's positive and negative effects on engagement, assessment, and intervention; and (3) telehealth work satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Results illustrate the need for increasing discernment for the benefit of patients to delineate paths of engagement through video, phone, hybrid, or in-person modalities by assessing the types of contextual factors identified by study participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03607283
DOI:10.1093/hsw/hlaf035