Factor structure for measures of bystander likelihood, barriers, and actions to prevent problematic alcohol use among college students.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Factor structure for measures of bystander likelihood, barriers, and actions to prevent problematic alcohol use among college students.
Authors: Montanaro, Erika (AUTHOR), Mennicke, Annelise (AUTHOR), McGonagle, Alyssa (AUTHOR), Moxie, Jessamyn (AUTHOR), Meehan, Erin A. (AUTHOR), Jules, Bridget N. (AUTHOR), Temple, Jasmine (AUTHOR), Brienzo, Michael J. (AUTHOR), Williams, Madi (AUTHOR), Yoder, Anna (AUTHOR), Carlson, Hannah (AUTHOR), Haley, Gabrielle (AUTHOR), Correia, Chris (AUTHOR), McMahon, Sarah (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of American College Health. Nov2025, Vol. 73 Issue 9, p3478-3489. 12p.
Subjects: Prevention of alcoholism, Research funding, Qualitative research, Focus groups, Cronbach's alpha, Research methodology evaluation, Interviewing, Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared test, Experimental design, Sound recordings, Psychometrics, Research methodology, Research, Alcohol drinking in college, Factor analysis, Data analysis software
Abstract: Objective: There are currently no adequate measures to assess bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use (PAU). Methods: We developed initial measures of bystander intervention for PAU, that include the constructs of likelihood to intervene, barriers to intervention, and actions taken in response to PAU situation. We sought to confirm the factor structure of the initial measures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Participants: We administered the measures in a college student sample (N = 1,270) recruited through Prime Panels. Results: CFA analysis resulted in the following two scales: 1) Bystander Alcohol Likelihood to Intervene (14 items), 2) Overcoming Bystander Alcohol Barriers to Intervene (22 items). The Bystander Alcohol Actions (22 items) was formative, no CFA was conducted. We found that the hypothesized model displayed significantly superior fit to all other models. Conclusion: These measures can be used to inform bystander intervention programs for PAU and as tools to evaluate bystander intervention programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: There are currently no adequate measures to assess bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use (PAU). Methods: We developed initial measures of bystander intervention for PAU, that include the constructs of likelihood to intervene, barriers to intervention, and actions taken in response to PAU situation. We sought to confirm the factor structure of the initial measures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Participants: We administered the measures in a college student sample (N = 1,270) recruited through Prime Panels. Results: CFA analysis resulted in the following two scales: 1) Bystander Alcohol Likelihood to Intervene (14 items), 2) Overcoming Bystander Alcohol Barriers to Intervene (22 items). The Bystander Alcohol Actions (22 items) was formative, no CFA was conducted. We found that the hypothesized model displayed significantly superior fit to all other models. Conclusion: These measures can be used to inform bystander intervention programs for PAU and as tools to evaluate bystander intervention programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07448481
DOI:10.1080/07448481.2024.2418534