Attitudes and barriers to mobile mental health interventions among first-year college students: a mixed-methods study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Attitudes and barriers to mobile mental health interventions among first-year college students: a mixed-methods study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | McCarthy, Kaitlyn (AUTHOR), Horwitz, Adam G. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of American College Health. Dec2025, Vol. 73 Issue 10, p3931-3940. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Health services accessibility, Self-evaluation, Mobile apps, Cross-sectional method, Scale analysis (Psychology), Mental health services, Research funding, T-test (Statistics), Mental health, Universities & colleges, Interviewing, Logistic regression analysis, Questionnaires, Descriptive statistics, Anxiety, Telemedicine, Thematic analysis, Race, Research methodology, Videoconferencing, Embarrassment, Psychology of college students, Student attitudes, Comparative studies, Mental depression |
| Abstract: | Objective: This mixed-methods study examined attitudes, barriers, and preferences for mobile mental health interventions among first-year college students. Participants: 351 students (64% women; 51% non-Hispanic White; 66% Heterosexual) from two campuses completed self-report assessments and 10 completed individual semi-structured interviews. Methods: Paired t-tests compared attitudes for various mHealth applications and logistic regressions examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mental health app users. Themes, topics, and quotes from interviews were derived through rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Mental health applications were less used and perceived to be less helpful than other mHealth applications. Past mental health app use was best predicted by past use of formal mental health care. Conclusions: Mobile health interventions have significant potential to diversify mental health services for students. Despite limited engagement with these resources, openness to digital interventions among students is quite high. Improving intervention features and increasing problem-recognition to facilitate help-seeking may result in greater uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: This mixed-methods study examined attitudes, barriers, and preferences for mobile mental health interventions among first-year college students. Participants: 351 students (64% women; 51% non-Hispanic White; 66% Heterosexual) from two campuses completed self-report assessments and 10 completed individual semi-structured interviews. Methods: Paired t-tests compared attitudes for various mHealth applications and logistic regressions examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mental health app users. Themes, topics, and quotes from interviews were derived through rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Mental health applications were less used and perceived to be less helpful than other mHealth applications. Past mental health app use was best predicted by past use of formal mental health care. Conclusions: Mobile health interventions have significant potential to diversify mental health services for students. Despite limited engagement with these resources, openness to digital interventions among students is quite high. Improving intervention features and increasing problem-recognition to facilitate help-seeking may result in greater uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 07448481 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2025.2458085 |
