Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience in young people who have experienced technology‐assisted sexual abuse: a feasibility clinical trial. |
| Authors: |
Bucci, Sandra (AUTHOR), Varese, Filippo (AUTHOR), Quayle, Ethel (AUTHOR), Cartwright, Kim (AUTHOR), Larkin, Amanda (AUTHOR), Chan, Cindy (AUTHOR), Chitsabesan, Prathiba (AUTHOR), Green, Victoria (AUTHOR), Hewins, William (AUTHOR), Machin, Matthew (AUTHOR), Newton, Alice (AUTHOR), Niebauer, Erica (AUTHOR), Norrie, John (AUTHOR), Radford, Gillian (AUTHOR), Richards, Cathy (AUTHOR), Sandys, Marina (AUTHOR), Selby, Victoria (AUTHOR), Shafi, Sara (AUTHOR), Ward, Jennifer (AUTHOR), Whelan, Pauline (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Child & Adolescent Mental Health. Feb2026, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p23-32. 10p. |
| Subjects: |
Child sexual abuse & psychology, Mental illness treatment, Mobile apps, Mental health services, Research funding, Digital health, Evaluation of human services programs, Clinical trials, Pilot projects, Questionnaires, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics, Technology, Research, Data analysis software, Confidence intervals, Children |
| Abstract: |
Background: The purpose of the present study was to conduct a feasibility trial of i‐Minds, a digital mental health intervention (DMHI) designed to improve mentalisation in young people (YP) who have experienced technology‐assisted sexual abuse (TASA). Enhancing mentalisation may reduce the risk of re‐victimisation, strengthen resilience, and support management of TASA‐related distress. However, evidence‐based interventions for TASA are nascent. Methods: We determined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a 6‐week mentalisation‐based DMHI for YP with TASA in a pre‐registered multicentre non‐randomised clinical trial (ISRCTN43130832). YP aged 12–18 years recruited across child and adolescent mental health services in two sites completed baseline and post‐treatment assessments. Results: Forty‐six people were recruited; 43 were allocated to the i‐Minds app; 86% completed follow‐up assessments. The average participant age was 15.42 years. Most participants identified as female (69.8%), White British (95.3%); a notable percentage identified as non‐binary/third gender or preferred not to disclose their gender identity (16.3%), and 20.9% reported their gender did not match their sex assigned at birth. We found signals of post‐treatment improvement in TASA‐related post‐traumatic symptoms, resilience, internalising symptoms, and reflective functioning. User feedback indicated that participants generally had a positive experience of using the app, positively impacting their knowledge/understanding of their own mental health and their motivation to address their mental health difficulties. There were no related adverse events. Conclusion: It is possible to recruit and retain participants for a DMHI trial of TASA. The i‐Minds app was safe, acceptable and showed promising signals of efficacy on valuable outcomes. Following further refinements, a powered efficacy trial is warranted to confirm and extend findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Child & Adolescent Mental Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |