View in EDS

Children's Numerical Estimation Is Biased by Male Informants More Than Female Informants.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Children's Numerical Estimation Is Biased by Male Informants More Than Female Informants.
Authors: Cracknell, Kathleen (AUTHOR), Hauss, Julia (AUTHOR), Chen, Miaofan (AUTHOR), Sierp, Robert (AUTHOR), Bian, Lin (AUTHOR), Wang, Jinjing (AUTHOR)
Source: Developmental Science. Mar2026, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p1-13. 13p.
Subjects: Gender stereotypes, Magnitude estimation, Social influence, Sex discrimination, Mathematical ability, School children
Abstract: Numerical estimation is one of the key early math skills and predicts children's long‐term math achievement. While children are born with an intuitive "number sense," they do not form a mapping between nonverbal numerical representations and symbolic numbers until about 5 years of age. This protracted learning process is embedded in children's interactions with other people, although little is known about how children's existing social beliefs may influence how they receive numerical information from other people. Meanwhile, children in the United States develop a stereotype to associate men with being better at math at around 6 years of age. Does this gender stereotype influence how children receive numerical information from other people? Using a numerical estimation task, we showed 5‐ to 7‐year‐old children (N = 198; 93 girls; United States) competing answers from a male and a female informant before asking children to provide their own answer. We found that children's answers were biased by the male informant more than the female, even when the female was accurate. This bias was domain‐specific, as there was no difference in children's performance on a memory control task. Furthermore, repeated exposure to inaccurate answers from a male informant (in contrast to accurate answers from a female informant) induced changes in children's estimation even when the informants were no longer present. Therefore, gender stereotypes may have profound impacts on how children acquire and process numerical information. Summary: Children form structural mappings between numerical quantities and their mental number line, which can be calibrated by numerical information from other people.Here, in two studies, we tested how informant gender influences children's estimation performance.Numerical information received from men has stronger calibration effects on children's estimation performance compared to information from women.Repeated exposure to overestimation from men has lasting impacts on children's subsequent estimation performance [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Developmental Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Numerical estimation is one of the key early math skills and predicts children's long‐term math achievement. While children are born with an intuitive "number sense," they do not form a mapping between nonverbal numerical representations and symbolic numbers until about 5 years of age. This protracted learning process is embedded in children's interactions with other people, although little is known about how children's existing social beliefs may influence how they receive numerical information from other people. Meanwhile, children in the United States develop a stereotype to associate men with being better at math at around 6 years of age. Does this gender stereotype influence how children receive numerical information from other people? Using a numerical estimation task, we showed 5‐ to 7‐year‐old children (N = 198; 93 girls; United States) competing answers from a male and a female informant before asking children to provide their own answer. We found that children's answers were biased by the male informant more than the female, even when the female was accurate. This bias was domain‐specific, as there was no difference in children's performance on a memory control task. Furthermore, repeated exposure to inaccurate answers from a male informant (in contrast to accurate answers from a female informant) induced changes in children's estimation even when the informants were no longer present. Therefore, gender stereotypes may have profound impacts on how children acquire and process numerical information. Summary: Children form structural mappings between numerical quantities and their mental number line, which can be calibrated by numerical information from other people.Here, in two studies, we tested how informant gender influences children's estimation performance.Numerical information received from men has stronger calibration effects on children's estimation performance compared to information from women.Repeated exposure to overestimation from men has lasting impacts on children's subsequent estimation performance [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:1363755X
DOI:10.1111/desc.70124