Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
The Mental Health Bill (2025) for England and Wales: professional and carer consensus statement summarising concerns and unintended consequences from proposed changes to autism and learning disability. |
| Authors: |
Beazley, Peter (AUTHOR), Alexander, Regi T. (AUTHOR), Taylor, John L. (AUTHOR), Velani, Bharat (AUTHOR), Dewson, Helen (AUTHOR), Shankar, Rohit (AUTHOR), Tromans, Samuel J. (AUTHOR), Odiyoor, Mahesh M. (AUTHOR), Hassiotis, Angela (AUTHOR), Roy, Ashok (AUTHOR), McKinnon, Iain (AUTHOR), Zia, Asif (AUTHOR), Strydom, Andre (AUTHOR), Keown, Patrick (AUTHOR), Perera, Bhathika (AUTHOR), Khan, Mohsin (AUTHOR), McCarthy, Jane (AUTHOR), Butler, Michael (AUTHOR), Chester, Verity (AUTHOR), Fitton, Lucy (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
British Journal of Psychiatry. Apr2026, Vol. 228 Issue 4, p367-372. 6p. |
| Subjects: |
Autism, Learning disabilities, Legislative bills, Detention of persons, Great Britain. Mental Health Act 1983, Great Britain. Parliament, Federal legislation |
| Geographic Terms: |
England |
| Abstract: |
The Mental Health Bill, 2025, proposes to remove autism and learning disability from the scope of Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (MHA). The present article represents a professional and carer consensus statement that raises concerns and identifies probable unintended consequences if this proposal becomes law. Our concerns relate to the lack of clear mandate for such proposals, conceptual inconsistency when considering other conditions that might give rise to a need for detention and the inconsistency in applying such changes to Part II of the MHA but not Part III. If the proposed changes become law, we anticipate that detentions would instead occur under the less safeguarded Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards framework, and that unmanaged risks will eventuate in behavioural consequences that will lead to more autistic people or those with a learning disability being sent to prison. Additionally, there is a concern that the proposed definitional breadth of autism and learning disability gives rise to a risk that people with other conditions may unintentionally be unable to be detained. We strongly urge the UK Parliament to amend this portion of the Bill prior to it becoming law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
