View in EDS

The spectrum of communication abilities in children with 12 rare neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study with caregivers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The spectrum of communication abilities in children with 12 rare neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study with caregivers.
Authors: Zigler, Christina K. (AUTHOR), McFatrich, Molly (AUTHOR), Lucas, Nicole (AUTHOR), Plyler, Kate (AUTHOR), Zapata‐Leiva, Leslie (AUTHOR), Gordon, Kelly (AUTHOR), Jones, Harrison N. (AUTHOR), Lin, Li (AUTHOR), Kern, Jennifer (AUTHOR), Radar, Abigail (AUTHOR), Chen, Dandan (AUTHOR), Bergelson, Elika (AUTHOR), Still, Kate (AUTHOR), Hinger, Brigette (AUTHOR), Delagrammatikas, Christal G. (AUTHOR), Poliquin, Sarah (AUTHOR), Short, Brittany P. (AUTHOR), Marfia‐Ash, Liz (AUTHOR), Stephens, Kimberly (AUTHOR), Oyler, Haley O. (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. May2026, Vol. 67 Issue 5, p740-754. 15p.
Subjects: Communicative competence, Speech therapists, Parents, Audit trails, Wit & humor, Child psychopathology, Research funding, Qualitative research, Medical personnel, Rare diseases, Interviewing, Content analysis, Field notes (Science), Judgment sampling, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Nonverbal communication, Sound recordings, Attitudes of medical personnel, Mathematical models, Conceptual structures, Research methodology, Statistics, Theory, Expertise, Data analysis software, Caregiver attitudes, Child behavior, Inter-observer reliability, Emotions in children, Children
Abstract: Background: Our aim was to update an existing model of communication ability for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) by centring caregiver and family perspectives. This project is part of a larger initiative to improve the measurement of communication ability for these children in the context of clinical trials. Methods: We conducted concept elicitation interviews with purposively selected clinical experts and caregivers of children with 12 NDDs, focusing on a broad definition of communication ability based on the Observer‐Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) measure, which is inclusive of different communication modalities and covers expressive, receptive and pragmatic communication concepts. Content‐based and thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data. Results: Altogether, 115 interviews were conducted with caregivers across the 12 NDDs and with 9 clinicians. Commonly mentioned concepts across NDDs included requesting an object, refusing an object, responding to familiar directions and seeking attention. There was notable heterogeneity within and across NDD groups in terms of the specific communication behaviours described for each communication concept. One common example was requesting; children used verbal speech, gestures, sign language, eye gaze, body movements and augmentative and assistive communication to ask for what they wanted. Novel communication concepts identified that were not part of the existing model were (1) feelings, emotions, and bodily sensations, (2) commenting on likes and dislikes, and (3) communicating and understanding humour. Conclusions: Caregivers offered a detailed and nuanced picture of their child's day‐to‐day communication. There was a considerable overlap between the communication concepts discussed by caregivers in the interviews and the existing conceptual model of communication ability. Some newly identified concepts underscore the need for further adaptation of the model and subsequent validation of any clinical outcome assessment before communication ability can be confidently measured for these individuals in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Background: Our aim was to update an existing model of communication ability for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) by centring caregiver and family perspectives. This project is part of a larger initiative to improve the measurement of communication ability for these children in the context of clinical trials. Methods: We conducted concept elicitation interviews with purposively selected clinical experts and caregivers of children with 12 NDDs, focusing on a broad definition of communication ability based on the Observer‐Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) measure, which is inclusive of different communication modalities and covers expressive, receptive and pragmatic communication concepts. Content‐based and thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data. Results: Altogether, 115 interviews were conducted with caregivers across the 12 NDDs and with 9 clinicians. Commonly mentioned concepts across NDDs included requesting an object, refusing an object, responding to familiar directions and seeking attention. There was notable heterogeneity within and across NDD groups in terms of the specific communication behaviours described for each communication concept. One common example was requesting; children used verbal speech, gestures, sign language, eye gaze, body movements and augmentative and assistive communication to ask for what they wanted. Novel communication concepts identified that were not part of the existing model were (1) feelings, emotions, and bodily sensations, (2) commenting on likes and dislikes, and (3) communicating and understanding humour. Conclusions: Caregivers offered a detailed and nuanced picture of their child's day‐to‐day communication. There was a considerable overlap between the communication concepts discussed by caregivers in the interviews and the existing conceptual model of communication ability. Some newly identified concepts underscore the need for further adaptation of the model and subsequent validation of any clinical outcome assessment before communication ability can be confidently measured for these individuals in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00219630
DOI:10.1111/jcpp.70063