View in EDS

Examining the effectiveness of the PAX-GOOD BEHAVIOUR GAME in improving the mental health and academic outcomes of FIRST NATIONS children in Canada: a clustered randomized controlled trial using administrative data.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Examining the effectiveness of the PAX-GOOD BEHAVIOUR GAME in improving the mental health and academic outcomes of FIRST NATIONS children in Canada: a clustered randomized controlled trial using administrative data.
Authors: Chartier, Mariette J. (AUTHOR), Turner, Frank (AUTHOR), Jiang, Depeng (AUTHOR), Au, Wendy (AUTHOR), McCulloch, Scott (AUTHOR), Brownell, Marni (AUTHOR), Santos, Rob (AUTHOR), Murdock, Nora (AUTHOR), Martinson, Amanda (AUTHOR), Boyd, Leanne (AUTHOR), Bolton, James (AUTHOR), Sareen, Jitender (AUTHOR)
Source: Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology. May2026, Vol. 61 Issue 5, p829-839. 11p.
Subjects: Indigenous children, Educational intervention, Educational outcomes, Indigenous peoples, School mental health services, Mental health, Randomized controlled trials
Geographic Terms: Canada
Abstract: Purpose: PAX Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG), a school-based mental health promotion approach, has been shown to improve children's mental health and academic outcomes. Given that these effects have yet to be shown in Indigenous populations, a partnership with First Nations communities was created to evaluate PAX-GBG's effectiveness among First Nations children living in Canada. Methods: In this clustered randomized controlled trial, we used population-based administrative data that allowed de-identified individual-level linkages. Our cohort from 20 First Nations schools was assigned to PAX-GBG (n = 468) or wait-list control (n = 255). We used multi-level regression modeling and propensity score weighting to estimate group differences in mental health and academic outcomes over time (2011–2020). Results: PAX-GBG group children had significantly greater decreases in conduct problems (β:-1.08, standard error(se):0.2505, p <.0001), hyperactivity-inattention (β:-1.13, se:0.3617, p =.0018), and peer problems (β:-1.10, se:0.3043, p =.0003) and a greater increase in prosocial scores (β:2.68, se:0.4139, p <.0001) than control group children. The percentage of PAX-GBG group children meeting academic expectations was higher than control group children. However, only third-grade numeracy (odds ratio (OR):4.30, confidence interval (CI):1.34 – 13.77) and eighth-grade reading and writing (OR:2.78, CI:1.01 – 7.67) were statistically significant. We found no evidence that PAX-GBG was associated with less emotional problems, diagnosed mental disorders, or greater student engagement or mathematics. Conclusion: These findings suggest that PAX-GBG is a promising intervention in improving First Nations children's mental health and academic outcomes. What remains unclear is whether these findings are generalizable to all First Nations and how adding supports for program implementation would influence these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Purpose: PAX Good Behaviour Game (PAX-GBG), a school-based mental health promotion approach, has been shown to improve children's mental health and academic outcomes. Given that these effects have yet to be shown in Indigenous populations, a partnership with First Nations communities was created to evaluate PAX-GBG's effectiveness among First Nations children living in Canada. Methods: In this clustered randomized controlled trial, we used population-based administrative data that allowed de-identified individual-level linkages. Our cohort from 20 First Nations schools was assigned to PAX-GBG (n = 468) or wait-list control (n = 255). We used multi-level regression modeling and propensity score weighting to estimate group differences in mental health and academic outcomes over time (2011–2020). Results: PAX-GBG group children had significantly greater decreases in conduct problems (β:-1.08, standard error(se):0.2505, p <.0001), hyperactivity-inattention (β:-1.13, se:0.3617, p =.0018), and peer problems (β:-1.10, se:0.3043, p =.0003) and a greater increase in prosocial scores (β:2.68, se:0.4139, p <.0001) than control group children. The percentage of PAX-GBG group children meeting academic expectations was higher than control group children. However, only third-grade numeracy (odds ratio (OR):4.30, confidence interval (CI):1.34 – 13.77) and eighth-grade reading and writing (OR:2.78, CI:1.01 – 7.67) were statistically significant. We found no evidence that PAX-GBG was associated with less emotional problems, diagnosed mental disorders, or greater student engagement or mathematics. Conclusion: These findings suggest that PAX-GBG is a promising intervention in improving First Nations children's mental health and academic outcomes. What remains unclear is whether these findings are generalizable to all First Nations and how adding supports for program implementation would influence these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09337954
DOI:10.1007/s00127-025-03028-6