The person behind the diagnosis.
Saved in:
| Title: | The person behind the diagnosis. |
|---|---|
| Source: | Australasian Psychiatry. Jun2026, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p307-309. 3p. |
| Subjects: | Diagnosis, Trauma-informed care, Psychiatry, Patient decision making, Humility, Maori (New Zealand people), Cultural awareness |
| Geographic Terms: | New Zealand |
| Abstract: | This article examines the tension in psychiatry between the necessity of diagnosis and the risk that it can overshadow the whole person it aims to help. It argues that while diagnosis provides clinical structure and access to care, it reduces complex human experiences into simplified categories that may obscure individual stories, trauma, and cultural context. The author emphasizes the importance of trauma-informed, culturally sensitive approaches—highlighting Māori and Pasifika perspectives in Aotearoa New Zealand—and advocates for ethical humility and shared decision-making to balance clinical authority with lived experience. Ultimately, the article calls for psychiatry to integrate scientific rigor with respect for personal history and agency to restore dignity and support genuine recovery beyond symptom management. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Australasian Psychiatry is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This article examines the tension in psychiatry between the necessity of diagnosis and the risk that it can overshadow the whole person it aims to help. It argues that while diagnosis provides clinical structure and access to care, it reduces complex human experiences into simplified categories that may obscure individual stories, trauma, and cultural context. The author emphasizes the importance of trauma-informed, culturally sensitive approaches—highlighting Māori and Pasifika perspectives in Aotearoa New Zealand—and advocates for ethical humility and shared decision-making to balance clinical authority with lived experience. Ultimately, the article calls for psychiatry to integrate scientific rigor with respect for personal history and agency to restore dignity and support genuine recovery beyond symptom management. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10398562 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10398562261444533c |
