A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of ADHD in Youth Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of ADHD in Youth Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.
Authors: Glenn, Andrea L. (AUTHOR), Hunter, Shelby (AUTHOR), Thompson, Olivia K. (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p673-687. 15p.
Subjects: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Ethnic groups, Diagnosis, Hispanic American youth, Evidence synthesis, Juvenile offenders, Asians, Teenagers
Abstract: Objective: To compare the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among Asian, Black, Latino, and White children and adolescents across studies while considering method of diagnosis. Method: Studies were included if they reported the prevalence of ADHD among at least two different racial/ethnic groups in an unselected population. Studies were grouped based on the method of diagnosis; studies involving juvenile offenders were analyzed separately. A total of 9,019 articles were retrieved and 371 articles were evaluated. After excluding studies with overlapping datasets, 28 studies were included in the population-based meta-analysis, and five studies were included in the meta-analysis involving juvenile offenders. Results: For studies asking caregivers if the child had received a diagnosis of ADHD (k = 23), the pooled prevalence of ADHD was lower for Latino (6.1%) and Asian (2.6%) youth than White youth (10.5%); the prevalence in Black youth (9.4%) was not significantly different from White youth. Among juvenile offenders (k = 5), the prevalence of ADHD was significantly lower in Black (19.1%) and Latino (17.0%) youth than in White youth (31.9%). Conclusions: The present study finds some racial/ethnic differences in prevalence rates of ADHD. The study demonstrates that the type of sample and method for assessing ADHD diagnosis are important to consider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: To compare the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among Asian, Black, Latino, and White children and adolescents across studies while considering method of diagnosis. Method: Studies were included if they reported the prevalence of ADHD among at least two different racial/ethnic groups in an unselected population. Studies were grouped based on the method of diagnosis; studies involving juvenile offenders were analyzed separately. A total of 9,019 articles were retrieved and 371 articles were evaluated. After excluding studies with overlapping datasets, 28 studies were included in the population-based meta-analysis, and five studies were included in the meta-analysis involving juvenile offenders. Results: For studies asking caregivers if the child had received a diagnosis of ADHD (k = 23), the pooled prevalence of ADHD was lower for Latino (6.1%) and Asian (2.6%) youth than White youth (10.5%); the prevalence in Black youth (9.4%) was not significantly different from White youth. Among juvenile offenders (k = 5), the prevalence of ADHD was significantly lower in Black (19.1%) and Latino (17.0%) youth than in White youth (31.9%). Conclusions: The present study finds some racial/ethnic differences in prevalence rates of ADHD. The study demonstrates that the type of sample and method for assessing ADHD diagnosis are important to consider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15374416
DOI:10.1080/15374416.2025.2592952