View in EDS

A Mixed-methods Study of How to Improve Primary-secondary Transitions in England: Combining Academic Research with Policy and Practice Consultation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Mixed-methods Study of How to Improve Primary-secondary Transitions in England: Combining Academic Research with Policy and Practice Consultation.
Authors: Bagnall, C. L. (AUTHOR), Edge, D. (AUTHOR), Banwell, E. (AUTHOR), Seymour, R. (AUTHOR), Garnett, N. (AUTHOR), Mason, C. (AUTHOR), Panayiotou, M. (AUTHOR), Jindal-Snape, D. (AUTHOR), Packer, R. (AUTHOR), Hodgkin, K. (AUTHOR), Skerritt, C. (AUTHOR), Donaldson, C. (AUTHOR), Birchwood, J. (AUTHOR), McAreavey, A. (AUTHOR), Cunningham, E. (AUTHOR), Symonds, J. E. (AUTHOR), Holliman, A. (AUTHOR)
Source: Educational Psychology Review. 7/4/2026, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p1-44. 44p.
Subjects: Education policy, Policy analysis, Mental health education, Educational attainment, Stakeholder analysis, Educators, Achievement gains (Education), Mixed methods research
Geographic Terms: England
Abstract: Primary-secondary school transitions are critical periods in children's educational and emotional development, which pose heightened risk for poor attainment, attendance, social adjustment, and mental health, particularly for vulnerable children. Yet, the multiple challenges presented during this time remain difficult for English schools to manage without clear statutory guidance. Government reports consistently identify transitions as a systemic weakness, while practitioners report uncertainty about what to prioritise, resulting in highly variable, locally interpreted provision. It is important that best practice guidance is developed, drawing on evidence from research, policy, and practice, to inform an evidence-informed transitions strategy in England. To narrow this gap, the present research takes an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, triangulating multiple stakeholder perspectives and multidisciplinary evidence to develop an evidence-based framework with policy recommendations. A systematic literature review was first conducted to explore key priority areas identified within existing research. Building on these insights, 10 round-table discussions were conducted to aggregate multi-disciplinary perspectives of 52 experts within educational practice, research, and policy, nationwide. Data were analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis, to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing high-quality primary-secondary school transitions provision, and what key priority areas should be included in national strategy. Meta-inferences were then drawn to develop an evidence-based framework outlining five policy recommendations, with implementation proposals of how each might be enacted in practice. This research offers a conceptual foundation to inform policy and could have practical utility for informing high-quality research and practice. Practical and contextual challenges associated with introducing a statutory transitions strategy in England are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Educational Psychology Review is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Primary-secondary school transitions are critical periods in children's educational and emotional development, which pose heightened risk for poor attainment, attendance, social adjustment, and mental health, particularly for vulnerable children. Yet, the multiple challenges presented during this time remain difficult for English schools to manage without clear statutory guidance. Government reports consistently identify transitions as a systemic weakness, while practitioners report uncertainty about what to prioritise, resulting in highly variable, locally interpreted provision. It is important that best practice guidance is developed, drawing on evidence from research, policy, and practice, to inform an evidence-informed transitions strategy in England. To narrow this gap, the present research takes an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, triangulating multiple stakeholder perspectives and multidisciplinary evidence to develop an evidence-based framework with policy recommendations. A systematic literature review was first conducted to explore key priority areas identified within existing research. Building on these insights, 10 round-table discussions were conducted to aggregate multi-disciplinary perspectives of 52 experts within educational practice, research, and policy, nationwide. Data were analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis, to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing high-quality primary-secondary school transitions provision, and what key priority areas should be included in national strategy. Meta-inferences were then drawn to develop an evidence-based framework outlining five policy recommendations, with implementation proposals of how each might be enacted in practice. This research offers a conceptual foundation to inform policy and could have practical utility for informing high-quality research and practice. Practical and contextual challenges associated with introducing a statutory transitions strategy in England are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:1040726X
DOI:10.1007/s10648-026-10174-z