The Biopsychosocial Model: Exploring Six Impossible Things.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Biopsychosocial Model: Exploring Six Impossible Things.
Authors: EPSTEIN, RONALD M., BORRELL-CARRIO, FRANCESC
Source: Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare. Winter2005, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p426-431. 6p.
Subjects: Clinical medicine, Social medicine, Ideology, Medical education, Medical model, Curiosity
Abstract: In our view, the biopsychosocial model is a vision and an approach to practice rather than an empirically verifiable theory, a coherent philosophy, or a clinical method. In some cases, when that vision is confused with ideologic dogmatism, it can invite abandonment of the vision entirely or in selected situations. The authors suggest that habits of mind may be the missing link between a biopsychosocial intent and clinical reality. These habits of mind include attentiveness, peripheral vision, curiosity, and informed flexibility. These qualities are teachable and can be reinforced. Rather than aspiring to "being biopsychosocial"—some imagined, static state—commitment to an ongoing process of "becoming biopsychosocial" is more pragmatic and realistic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family HealthCare is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:In our view, the biopsychosocial model is a vision and an approach to practice rather than an empirically verifiable theory, a coherent philosophy, or a clinical method. In some cases, when that vision is confused with ideologic dogmatism, it can invite abandonment of the vision entirely or in selected situations. The authors suggest that habits of mind may be the missing link between a biopsychosocial intent and clinical reality. These habits of mind include attentiveness, peripheral vision, curiosity, and informed flexibility. These qualities are teachable and can be reinforced. Rather than aspiring to "being biopsychosocial"—some imagined, static state—commitment to an ongoing process of "becoming biopsychosocial" is more pragmatic and realistic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10917527
DOI:10.1037/1091-7527.23.4.426