Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.
Authors: Rijnsburger, A. J., Essink-Bot, M. L., van As, E., Cockburn, J., Koning, H. J., de Koning, H J (AUTHOR)
Source: Quality of Life Research. Jun2006, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p933-940. 8p. 6 Charts.
Subjects: Breast cancer diagnosis, Questionnaires, Psychometrics, Psychosocial factors, Cancer patients
Geographic Terms: Netherlands
Abstract: Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of a Dutch adaptation of an originally Australian instrument measuring the psychological impact of breast cancer screening.Methods: The three subscales (emotional, physical, social) of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) underwent formal linguistic and cultural translation. A total of 524 women under intensive surveillance because of increased breast cancer risk were asked to complete the questionnaire at 2 months prior to screening, at the day of the screening visit preceding the screening, and 1-4 weeks after screening. Acceptability, score distribution, internal consistency, scale structure, responsiveness to change and construct validity were analysed.Results: Response rates were high (98-94%) and there were very few missing answers and non-unique answers. All scales had Cronbach's alphas > 0.70. The physical and social subscale showed ceiling effects. The item-own scale correlations were only slightly higher than the corresponding item-other scale correlations. Factor analysis showed that the assumed three separate subscales were replicated in our study. Pre- and post-screening effect sizes for the emotional scale were larger than for the other two scales. All PCQ scales correlated with the scales of two other psychological measures (p Conclusion: The Dutch PCQ is useful in measuring psychological impact among women under intensive surveillance because of high breast cancer risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess the psychometric properties of a Dutch adaptation of an originally Australian instrument measuring the psychological impact of breast cancer screening.<bold>Methods: </bold>The three subscales (emotional, physical, social) of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) underwent formal linguistic and cultural translation. A total of 524 women under intensive surveillance because of increased breast cancer risk were asked to complete the questionnaire at 2 months prior to screening, at the day of the screening visit preceding the screening, and 1-4 weeks after screening. Acceptability, score distribution, internal consistency, scale structure, responsiveness to change and construct validity were analysed.<bold>Results: </bold>Response rates were high (98-94%) and there were very few missing answers and non-unique answers. All scales had Cronbach's alphas > 0.70. The physical and social subscale showed ceiling effects. The item-own scale correlations were only slightly higher than the corresponding item-other scale correlations. Factor analysis showed that the assumed three separate subscales were replicated in our study. Pre- and post-screening effect sizes for the emotional scale were larger than for the other two scales. All PCQ scales correlated with the scales of two other psychological measures (p <or= 0.01). The emotional scale and the total PCQ score were able to differentiate between subgroups varying in affective risk perception (p <or= 0.01).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The Dutch PCQ is useful in measuring psychological impact among women under intensive surveillance because of high breast cancer risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09629343
DOI:10.1007/s11136-005-5093-8