Application of Motor Learning Principles to Complex Surgical Tasks: Searching for the Optimal Practice Schedule.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Application of Motor Learning Principles to Complex Surgical Tasks: Searching for the Optimal Practice Schedule.
Authors:	Brydges, Ryan, Carnahan, Heather, Backstein, David, Dubrowski, Adam
Source:	Journal of Motor Behavior. Jan2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p40-48. 9p. 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subjects:	Motor learning, Orthopedic surgery, Motor ability, Performance, Cognitive learning, Learning ability, Kinematics, Psychology of learning, Operative surgery
Abstract:	Practice of complex tasks can be scheduled in several ways: as whole-task practice or as practice of the individual skills composing the task in either a blocked or a random order. The authors used those 3 schedules to study 18 participants' learning of an orthopedic surgical task. They assessed learning by obtaining expert evaluation of performance and objective kinematic measures before, immediately after, and 1 week after practice (transfer test). During acquisition, the blocked group showed superior performance for simple skills but not for more complex skills. For the expert-based measures of performance, all groups improved from pretest to posttest and remained constant from posttest to transfer. Measures of the final product showed that the whole-practice group's outcomes were significantly better than those of the random group on transfer. All groups showed better efficiency of motions in the posttest than in the pretest. Those measures were also poorer on the transfer test than on the posttest. The present evidence does not support the contextual interference effect-hypothetically, because of the inherent cognitive effort effect associated with some of the component skills. The authors recommend that surgical tasks composed of several discrete skills be practiced as a whole. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of critically appraising basic theories in applied environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Motor Behavior is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Description
Abstract:	Practice of complex tasks can be scheduled in several ways: as whole-task practice or as practice of the individual skills composing the task in either a blocked or a random order. The authors used those 3 schedules to study 18 participants' learning of an orthopedic surgical task. They assessed learning by obtaining expert evaluation of performance and objective kinematic measures before, immediately after, and 1 week after practice (transfer test). During acquisition, the blocked group showed superior performance for simple skills but not for more complex skills. For the expert-based measures of performance, all groups improved from pretest to posttest and remained constant from posttest to transfer. Measures of the final product showed that the whole-practice group's outcomes were significantly better than those of the random group on transfer. All groups showed better efficiency of motions in the posttest than in the pretest. Those measures were also poorer on the transfer test than on the posttest. The present evidence does not support the contextual interference effect-hypothetically, because of the inherent cognitive effort effect associated with some of the component skills. The authors recommend that surgical tasks composed of several discrete skills be practiced as a whole. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of critically appraising basic theories in applied environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	00222895
DOI:	10.3200/JMBR.39.1.40-48