Client satisfaction and risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines: a pilot study.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Client satisfaction and risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines: a pilot study.
Authors:	Islam, Md Mofizul, Stern, Tim, Conigrave, Katherine M., Wodak, Alex
Source:	Drug & Alcohol Review. Jan2008, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p13-19. 7p. 2 Color Photographs, 4 Charts.
Subjects:	Patient satisfaction, Risk-taking behavior, Syringes, Injections, Drug administration, Health surveys, Medical equipment, Needle sharing, Medical care costs
Abstract:	Introduction and Aims. The study examines risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines (SDMs) and evaluates the usefulness of these machines in providing injecting drug users (IDUs) with sterile injecting equipment. Design and Methods. Self-administered questionnaires were used among users of SDMs in an Area Health Service of Sydney. Results. The majority of the 167 participants reported being happy with the quality of the SDM services. Problems identified with machines were that they were often broken or jammed (32.8% respondents), not in the right place (21.9%) or require money (16.7%). Just over half (50.9%) of the IDUs use SDMs only from 5 p.m. to 9 a.m., the time when almost all other outlets for accessing sterile injecting equipment remain closed. Relatively young IDUs (age ≤ 30 years) were more likely to prefer SDMs over staffed needle syringe programmes (NSPs) compared with older users (age > 30) and to identify stigma (a desire to hide their identity or not liking the way people treat them at staffed NSPs or chemists) as a main reason for using these machines. Primary users of SDMs do not differ from primary users of NSP/chemists in terms of sharing of needles. Those users who had shared in the last month were nearly four times as likely to have never used condoms in sexual encounters over that period (95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 14.5). Discussion and Conclusion. SDMs appear to complement other outlets of NSPs. Providing free-of-cost equipment from SDMs should be considered carefully, as needing money to buy equipment was a reason given for sharing of needles by 35% of those who shared. [Islam MM, Stern T, Conigrave KM, Wodak A. Client satisfaction and risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines: a pilot study. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:13 - 19] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Description
Abstract:	Introduction and Aims. The study examines risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines (SDMs) and evaluates the usefulness of these machines in providing injecting drug users (IDUs) with sterile injecting equipment. Design and Methods. Self-administered questionnaires were used among users of SDMs in an Area Health Service of Sydney. Results. The majority of the 167 participants reported being happy with the quality of the SDM services. Problems identified with machines were that they were often broken or jammed (32.8% respondents), not in the right place (21.9%) or require money (16.7%). Just over half (50.9%) of the IDUs use SDMs only from 5 p.m. to 9 a.m., the time when almost all other outlets for accessing sterile injecting equipment remain closed. Relatively young IDUs (age ≤ 30 years) were more likely to prefer SDMs over staffed needle syringe programmes (NSPs) compared with older users (age > 30) and to identify stigma (a desire to hide their identity or not liking the way people treat them at staffed NSPs or chemists) as a main reason for using these machines. Primary users of SDMs do not differ from primary users of NSP/chemists in terms of sharing of needles. Those users who had shared in the last month were nearly four times as likely to have never used condoms in sexual encounters over that period (95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 14.5). Discussion and Conclusion. SDMs appear to complement other outlets of NSPs. Providing free-of-cost equipment from SDMs should be considered carefully, as needing money to buy equipment was a reason given for sharing of needles by 35% of those who shared. [Islam MM, Stern T, Conigrave KM, Wodak A. Client satisfaction and risk behaviours of the users of syringe dispensing machines: a pilot study. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:13 - 19] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	09595236
DOI:	10.1080/09595230701711199