View in EDS

Variability in Pediatric Brain Death Determination and Documentation in Southern California.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Variability in Pediatric Brain Death Determination and Documentation in Southern California.
Authors: Mathur, Mudit, Petersen, LuCyndi, Stadtler, Maria, Rose, Colleen, Ejike, J. Chiaka, Petersen, Floyd, Tinsley, Cynthia, Ashwal, Stephen
Source: Pediatrics. May2008, Vol. 121 Issue 5, p988-993. 6p. 3 Charts.
Subjects: Brain death, Pediatrics, Neurology, Electroencephalography, Clinical medicine
Geographic Terms: California
Abstract: OBJECTIVES. Because the concept of brain death is difficult to define and to apply, we hypothesized that significant variability exists in pediatric brain death determination and documentation. METHODS. Children (0-18 years of age) for whom death was determined with neurologic criteria between January 2000 and December 2004, in southern California, were included. Medical charts were reviewed for documented performance of 14 specific elements derived from the 1987 brain death guidelines and confirmatory testing. RESULTS. A total of 51.2% of children (142 of 277 children) referred to OneLegacy became organ donors. Care locations varied, including PICUs (68%), adult ICUs (29%); and other (3%). One patient was <7 days, 6 were 7 days to 2 months, 22 were 2 months to 1 year, and 113 were >1 year of age. The number of brain death examinations performed was 0 (4 patients), 2 (122 patients), 3 (14 patients), or 4 (2 patients). Recommended intervals between examinations were followed for 18% of patients >1 year of age and for no younger patients. A mean of only 5.5 of 14 examination elements were completed by neurologists and pediatric intensivists and 5.8 by neurosurgeons. No apnea testing was recorded in 60% of cases, and inadequate PacO2 increase occurred in more than one half. Cerebral blood flow determination was performed as a confirmatory test 74% of the time (83 of 112 cases), compared with 26% (29 of 112 cases) for electroencephalography alone. CONCLUSIONS. Children suffering brain death are cared for in various locations by a diverse group of specialists. Clinical practice varies greatly from established guidelines, and documentation is incomplete for most patients. Physicians rely on cerebral blood flow measurements more than electroencephalography for confirmatory testing. Codifying clinical and testing criteria into a checklist could lend uniformity and enhance the quality and rigor of this crucial determination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Pediatrics is the property of American Academy of Pediatrics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:OBJECTIVES. Because the concept of brain death is difficult to define and to apply, we hypothesized that significant variability exists in pediatric brain death determination and documentation. METHODS. Children (0-18 years of age) for whom death was determined with neurologic criteria between January 2000 and December 2004, in southern California, were included. Medical charts were reviewed for documented performance of 14 specific elements derived from the 1987 brain death guidelines and confirmatory testing. RESULTS. A total of 51.2% of children (142 of 277 children) referred to OneLegacy became organ donors. Care locations varied, including PICUs (68%), adult ICUs (29%); and other (3%). One patient was <7 days, 6 were 7 days to 2 months, 22 were 2 months to 1 year, and 113 were >1 year of age. The number of brain death examinations performed was 0 (4 patients), 2 (122 patients), 3 (14 patients), or 4 (2 patients). Recommended intervals between examinations were followed for 18% of patients >1 year of age and for no younger patients. A mean of only 5.5 of 14 examination elements were completed by neurologists and pediatric intensivists and 5.8 by neurosurgeons. No apnea testing was recorded in 60% of cases, and inadequate PacO2 increase occurred in more than one half. Cerebral blood flow determination was performed as a confirmatory test 74% of the time (83 of 112 cases), compared with 26% (29 of 112 cases) for electroencephalography alone. CONCLUSIONS. Children suffering brain death are cared for in various locations by a diverse group of specialists. Clinical practice varies greatly from established guidelines, and documentation is incomplete for most patients. Physicians rely on cerebral blood flow measurements more than electroencephalography for confirmatory testing. Codifying clinical and testing criteria into a checklist could lend uniformity and enhance the quality and rigor of this crucial determination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00314005
DOI:10.1542/peds.2007-1871