TECHNOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON AESTHETIC EVALUATION: VERMEER AND THE CAMERA OBSCURA.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: TECHNOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON AESTHETIC EVALUATION: VERMEER AND THE CAMERA OBSCURA.
Authors: Hantula, Donald A., Sudduth, Mary Margaret, Clabaugh, Alison
Source: Psychological Record. Summer2009, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p323-333. 11p.
Subjects: Art & technology, Aesthetics, Camera obscuras, Dutch painting, Realism in art, Vermeer, Johannes, 1632-1675
Abstract: The question of whether an artist's use of technology to create art results in a detectable aesthetic difference was investigated in the case of Dutch realist painter Johannes Vermeer and his use of the camera obscura. In Experiment 1, participants evaluated 20 Vermeer paintings on 6 aesthetic dimensions and preferred paintings created with the aid of the camera obscura. In Experiment 2, participants evaluated 4 Vermeer paintings on 6 aesthetic dimensions after they either read about camera obscura technology or read in general about methods of creating art in the Dutch realist school of painting. Knowledge of technology use did not affect aesthetic evaluation. In Vermeer's case, technology was used to enhance rather than substitute for artistic talent and did not decrease but rather enhanced the viewer's aesthetic experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Record is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:The question of whether an artist's use of technology to create art results in a detectable aesthetic difference was investigated in the case of Dutch realist painter Johannes Vermeer and his use of the camera obscura. In Experiment 1, participants evaluated 20 Vermeer paintings on 6 aesthetic dimensions and preferred paintings created with the aid of the camera obscura. In Experiment 2, participants evaluated 4 Vermeer paintings on 6 aesthetic dimensions after they either read about camera obscura technology or read in general about methods of creating art in the Dutch realist school of painting. Knowledge of technology use did not affect aesthetic evaluation. In Vermeer's case, technology was used to enhance rather than substitute for artistic talent and did not decrease but rather enhanced the viewer's aesthetic experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00332933
DOI:10.1007/BF03395667