Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Allergic Asthmatic Patients: Radiography Versus Low-Dose Computed Tomography Evaluation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Allergic Asthmatic Patients: Radiography Versus Low-Dose Computed Tomography Evaluation.
Authors: Stelmach, Rafael (AUTHOR), Junior, Servulo Azevedo Dias (AUTHOR), Figueiredo, Claudia Maria (AUTHOR), Uezumi, Kiyomi (AUTHOR), Genu, Ana Maria (AUTHOR), Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria (AUTHOR), Cukier, Alberto (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Asthma. Aug2010, Vol. 47 Issue 6, p599-603. 5p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subjects: Sinusitis, Paranasal sinuses, Medical radiography, Tomography, Asthmatics, Obstructive lung diseases
Abstract: Objective. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a risk factor for asthma exacerbations and is associated with greater clinical severity. Discrepancies may exist between CRS clinical diagnosis and data from paranasal sinus (PS) X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective was to compare PS involvement using low-dose CT and plain X-ray in allergic asthmatic patients with rhinitis. Methods. Patients underwent PS radiography in the frontal and mentonian positions and low-dose CT consisting of six to eight coronal scans performed on the central region of the sphenoidal, ethmoidal, maxillary, and frontal sinuses. Possible results for each sinus were a normal aspect or the presence of mucosal thickening, opacification, and/or air-fluid level. Results. Eighty-five (93.4%) of 91 study patients had radiological changes on radiography or CT. In only six (6.6%) were both tests normal. The maxillary was the most involved sinus by both methods. Simultaneous PS abnormalities were observed in 40.5% on X-ray and 56.7% on CT. For the frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, the proportion of normal results differed significantly between X-ray and CT: 80.2% versus 89%, 76.9% versus 63.7% and 96.7% versus 70.3%, respectively ( p <.05). Agreement was over 70% for the maxillary and frontal sinuses. CT also provided a better diagnosis of air-fluid level changes than X-ray. Conclusions. Low-dose CT significantly showed larger number of normal PS results and diagnosed more severe PS lesions. As the determination of true sinus severity lesion impacts in asthma control, low-dose CT may replace PS plain X-ray and conventional CT to support better clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Asthma is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a risk factor for asthma exacerbations and is associated with greater clinical severity. Discrepancies may exist between CRS clinical diagnosis and data from paranasal sinus (PS) X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective was to compare PS involvement using low-dose CT and plain X-ray in allergic asthmatic patients with rhinitis. Methods. Patients underwent PS radiography in the frontal and mentonian positions and low-dose CT consisting of six to eight coronal scans performed on the central region of the sphenoidal, ethmoidal, maxillary, and frontal sinuses. Possible results for each sinus were a normal aspect or the presence of mucosal thickening, opacification, and/or air-fluid level. Results. Eighty-five (93.4%) of 91 study patients had radiological changes on radiography or CT. In only six (6.6%) were both tests normal. The maxillary was the most involved sinus by both methods. Simultaneous PS abnormalities were observed in 40.5% on X-ray and 56.7% on CT. For the frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, the proportion of normal results differed significantly between X-ray and CT: 80.2% versus 89%, 76.9% versus 63.7% and 96.7% versus 70.3%, respectively ( p <.05). Agreement was over 70% for the maxillary and frontal sinuses. CT also provided a better diagnosis of air-fluid level changes than X-ray. Conclusions. Low-dose CT significantly showed larger number of normal PS results and diagnosed more severe PS lesions. As the determination of true sinus severity lesion impacts in asthma control, low-dose CT may replace PS plain X-ray and conventional CT to support better clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02770903
DOI:10.3109/02770903.2010.481339