PERSON-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND KNOWLEDGE OF BIOLOGICAL CATEGORIES.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: PERSON-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND KNOWLEDGE OF BIOLOGICAL CATEGORIES.
Authors: Kay, Janice, Hanley, J. Richard
Source: Cognitive Neuropsychology. Mar1999, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p171-180. 10p.
Subjects: Cognitive neuroscience, Memory
Abstract: We report new findings from a neurological case described by Hanley, Young, and Pearson (1989). In the original study, the patient, BD, had impaired biographical knowledge of people which appeared to extend to a general impairment of knowledge of "living things". In more recent work, we present evidence which confirms Hanley et al.'s finding that BD has impaired person-specific knowledge, but we suggest that this is not associated with a more general impairment to do with knowledge of biological categories. We propose that an artefactual explanation of the original account is more likely based on differences in ''age of acquisition" between items from "living" and "nonliving" categories. We conclude that biographical knowledge of people is represented separately from knowledge of biological categories in semantic memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cognitive Neuropsychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:We report new findings from a neurological case described by Hanley, Young, and Pearson (1989). In the original study, the patient, BD, had impaired biographical knowledge of people which appeared to extend to a general impairment of knowledge of "living things". In more recent work, we present evidence which confirms Hanley et al.'s finding that BD has impaired person-specific knowledge, but we suggest that this is not associated with a more general impairment to do with knowledge of biological categories. We propose that an artefactual explanation of the original account is more likely based on differences in ''age of acquisition" between items from "living" and "nonliving" categories. We conclude that biographical knowledge of people is represented separately from knowledge of biological categories in semantic memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02643294
DOI:10.1080/026432999380942