The relationship between therapeutic engagement, cognitive errors, and coping action patterns: An exploratory study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The relationship between therapeutic engagement, cognitive errors, and coping action patterns: An exploratory study.
Authors: Lewandowski, M. (AUTHOR), D'iuso, D. (AUTHOR), Blake, E. (AUTHOR), Fitzpatrick, M. (AUTHOR), Drapeau, M. (AUTHOR)
Source: Counselling & Psychotherapy Research. Dec2011, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p284-290. 7p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Psychological adaptation, Behavior, Cognition, Statistical correlation, Interpersonal relations, Health outcome assessment, Psychotherapy, Questionnaires, Research, Research funding, Scale analysis (Psychology), Scales (Weighing instruments), Self-evaluation, Statistics, Pilot projects, Data analysis, Treatment effectiveness, Inter-observer reliability, Undergraduates, Patients' attitudes, Descriptive statistics
Geographic Terms: Canada
Abstract: Aim: This exploratory study examined the relationship between clients’ involvement in therapy and their cognitive errors (CE) and coping action patterns (CAP). Method: Therapy sessions from N = 26 clients were rated for CE and CP using the CE and CAP methods. Client involvement was measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, as well as the . Results: The CEs’ ‘magnification of the negative or minimisation of the positive’ and ‘labelling’ were associated with measures of affective therapeutic engagement. The coping styles ‘negotiation’, ‘opposition’, ‘submission’, ‘isolation’, ‘support seeking’, ‘information seeking’, ‘delegation’, and ‘escape’ were found to be associated with affective and behavioural dimensions of therapeutic involvement. Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary supporting evidence that CE and CP are related to the extent to which clients engage in the work of therapy. Implications for researchers and therapists are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Counselling & Psychotherapy Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Aim: This exploratory study examined the relationship between clients’ involvement in therapy and their cognitive errors (CE) and coping action patterns (CAP). Method: Therapy sessions from N = 26 clients were rated for CE and CP using the CE and CAP methods. Client involvement was measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, as well as the . Results: The CEs’ ‘magnification of the negative or minimisation of the positive’ and ‘labelling’ were associated with measures of affective therapeutic engagement. The coping styles ‘negotiation’, ‘opposition’, ‘submission’, ‘isolation’, ‘support seeking’, ‘information seeking’, ‘delegation’, and ‘escape’ were found to be associated with affective and behavioural dimensions of therapeutic involvement. Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary supporting evidence that CE and CP are related to the extent to which clients engage in the work of therapy. Implications for researchers and therapists are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
ISSN:14733145
DOI:10.1080/14733145.2010.531280