IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"?
Authors: Manzotti, Riccardo, Moderato, Paolo
Source: Behavior & Philosophy. 2010, Vol. 38, p1-29. 29p.
Subjects: Brain, Radiography, Neurosciences, Mind & body, Logical positivism, Materialism
Abstract: The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcoming ''mindscience.'' Perhaps surprisingly for many, this conclusion is still largely unwarranted. The present paper surveys various shortcomings of neuroscience as a putative ''mindscience.'' The analysis shows that the scope of mind (both cognitive and phenomenal) falls outside that of neuroscience. Of course, such a conclusion does not endorse any metaphysical or antiscientific stance as to the nature of the mind. Rather, it challenges a series of assumptions that the undeniable success of neuroscience has fostered. In fact, physicalism is here taken as the only viable ontological framework--an assumption that does not imply that the central nervous system exhausts the physical domain. There are other options like behavior, embodiment, situatedness, and externalism that are worth considering. Likewise, neuroscience is not the only available epistemic option as to the understanding of mind. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Behavior & Philosophy is the property of Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 76108934
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manzotti%2C+Riccardo%22">Manzotti, Riccardo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moderato%2C+Paolo%22">Moderato, Paolo</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Behavior+%26+Philosophy%22">Behavior & Philosophy</searchLink>. 2010, Vol. 38, p1-29. 29p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain%22">Brain</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiography%22">Radiography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neurosciences%22">Neurosciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mind+%26+body%22">Mind & body</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logical+positivism%22">Logical positivism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Materialism%22">Materialism</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcoming ''mindscience.'' Perhaps surprisingly for many, this conclusion is still largely unwarranted. The present paper surveys various shortcomings of neuroscience as a putative ''mindscience.'' The analysis shows that the scope of mind (both cognitive and phenomenal) falls outside that of neuroscience. Of course, such a conclusion does not endorse any metaphysical or antiscientific stance as to the nature of the mind. Rather, it challenges a series of assumptions that the undeniable success of neuroscience has fostered. In fact, physicalism is here taken as the only viable ontological framework--an assumption that does not imply that the central nervous system exhausts the physical domain. There are other options like behavior, embodiment, situatedness, and externalism that are worth considering. Likewise, neuroscience is not the only available epistemic option as to the understanding of mind. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Behavior & Philosophy is the property of Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=76108934
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 29
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Brain
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Radiography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neurosciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mind & body
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logical positivism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Materialism
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Manzotti, Riccardo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moderato, Paolo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: 2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10538348
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Behavior & Philosophy
              Type: main
ResultId 1