Ward v. Wilbanks: Students Respond.
Saved in:
| Title: | Ward v. Wilbanks: Students Respond. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Burkholder, David, Hall, Stephanie F. |
| Source: | Journal of Counseling & Development (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Apr2014, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p232-240. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Actions on the case, Eastern Michigan University, Qualitative research, Ethics, American Counseling Association, Counseling |
| Abstract: | Ward v. Wilbanks is the most important legal case for the profession of counseling in the last 25 years. This qualitative research used general content analysis to examine master's-level counseling students' responses to the Ward v. Wilbanks case. Emergent themes from data analysis include (a) the role of gatekeeping; (b) Julea Ward and Eastern Michigan University: inflexible and uncompromising; (c) Ward v. Wilbanks: confusion, complexity, and certainty; and (d) personal values, professional values, and the ACA Code of Ethics (American Counseling Association, ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Counseling & Development (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Ward v. Wilbanks is the most important legal case for the profession of counseling in the last 25 years. This qualitative research used general content analysis to examine master's-level counseling students' responses to the Ward v. Wilbanks case. Emergent themes from data analysis include (a) the role of gatekeeping; (b) Julea Ward and Eastern Michigan University: inflexible and uncompromising; (c) Ward v. Wilbanks: confusion, complexity, and certainty; and (d) personal values, professional values, and the ACA Code of Ethics (American Counseling Association, ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15566676 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00152.x |
